It doesn't seem to have occurred to her that "85 to 90%" could be interpreted any other way than how she thought it should be.

You know you look better if you admit you’re wrong or simply stay silent, right? Only one of the 2 calculations could possibly be higher. We both know which one it is. Everyone knows which one it is. No need to play dumb. Hint, it’s the one that counts a broader range of deaths as covid deaths, the one that specifically says in your posted quote that it’s less precise, which also happens to be the one used for official death counts up to a few months ago.

Nevertheless, i was being generous. Could be overstated by more than 15%. If the actual count shows, say 85 deaths, and the count with the overstated number shows 100 deaths (85% correlation), that would be overstated by 17.6%.

It doesn't seem to have occurred to her that "85 to 90%" could be interpreted any other way than how she thought it should be.

You know you look better if you admit you’re wrong or simply stay silent, right? Only one of the 2 calculations could possibly be higher. We both know which one it is. Everyone knows which one it is. No need to play dumb. Hint, it’s the one that counts more deaths as covid, the one that specifically says in your posted quote that it’s less precise, which also happens to be the one used for official death counts up to a few months ago.

Nevertheless, i was being generous. Could be overstated by more than 15%. If the actual count shows, say 85 deaths, and the count with the overstated number shows 100 deaths (85% correlation), that would be overstated by 17.6%.

It doesn't seem to have occurred to her that "85 to 90%" could be interpreted any other way than how she thought it should be.

You know you look better if you admit you’re wrong or simply stay silent, right? Only one of the 2 calculations could possibly be higher. We both know which one it is. Everyone knows which one it is. No need to play dumb. Hint, it’s the one that counts more deaths as covid, the one that specifically says in your posted quote that it’s less precise.

Nevertheless, i was being generous. Could be overstated by more than 15%. If the actual count shows, say 85 deaths, and the count with the overstated number shows 100 deaths (85% correlation), that would be overstated by 17.6%.

It doesn't seem to have occurred to her that "85 to 90%" could be interpreted any other way than how she thought it should be.

You know you look better if you admit you’re wrong or simply stay silent, right? Only one of the 2 calculations could possibly be higher. We both know which one it is. Everyone knows which one it is. No need to play dumb.

Nevertheless, i was being generous. Could be overstated by more than 15%. If the actual count shows, say 85 deaths, and the count with the overstated number shows 100 deaths (85% correlation), that would be overstated by 17.6%.