No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the beginning they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That's why most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

As brazen as all this sounds, when the DNC/Clintons did it, they assumed that Hillary would be president soon which means it would all be swept under the rug (because she would then be in charge of the FBI and the rest of the federal intel/law enforcement establishment). They never thought she would lose.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the beginning they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That's why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

As brazen as all this sounds, when the DNC/Clintons did it, they assumed that Hillary would be president soon which means it would all be swept under the rug (because she would then be in charge of the FBI and the rest of the federal intel/law enforcement establishment). They never thought she would lose.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That's why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

As brazen as all this sounds, when the DNC/Clintons did it, they assumed that Hillary would be president soon which means it would all be swept under the rug (because she would then be in charge of the FBI and the rest of the federal intel/law enforcement establishment). They never thought she would lose.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That's why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

As brazen as all this sounds, when the DNC/Clintons did it, they assumed that Hillary would be president soon which means it would all be swept under the rug. They never thought she would lose.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That's why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the email server and was a Bernie supporter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearings that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked!". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians). That's why it's never been seen since.

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wasn't hacked by the Russians).

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) and the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wans;t hacked by the Russians).

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wans;t hacked by the Russians).

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder. He was a DNC staffer who worked in IT, had access to the emial server and was a bernie supppoerter who was disgruntled about the DNC rigging the primary against him. That why the most of the emails that got leaked were in relation to the primary rigging. The aim of the leak was to expose that.

No sane person believes Russia hacked the DNC's servers.

• Wikileaks - the very organization who got the emails from the source and published them - said from the begiining they didn't come from a hack, they came from an internal leak.

• When Clinton and the DNC tried to blame on the Russians in a ham-fisted attempt to salvage something from this disaster, the FBI got involved (because that's a crime, foreign espionage and a national security issue) the DNC refused to hand over the server to investigators. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta actually kicked the FBI agents out of the building when they showed up to collect the server. To date, no intelligence or law enforcement agency has ever been allowed to so much as see the server let alone analyze it. The DNC probably destroyed it (because if analyzed, it would reveal it wans;t hacked by the Russians).

• Instead of letting the authorities investigate the server, the DNC had their own people (Crowdstrike) "analyze" the server and write up a report containing "proof" that it was a Russian hack. Then they handed that report to all 13 federal intelligence agencies, those agencies said "Well ok, if that's what happened then that would indicate Russian hacking". Then Hillary went on TV and said "13 intelligence agencies agree that our server was hacked". But not one of them was even allowed to look at the server. They were going purely off of what the Democrats told them.

• Then recently it was revealed that Crowdstrike admitted to congress in closed hearing that “We did not have concrete evidence” of Russian hacking.

• Julian Assange has all but named Seth Rich as the leaker (who BTW was murdered in a late night "mugging" where nothing was stolen right when the DNC/Clinton campaign were trying to blame the Russians). Wikileaks even put up a $20,000 reward leading to an arrest in Rich's murder.