word games about who is considered "vaccinated"
You are free to maintain your position that someone who has lost their protection against the virus should still be counted as protected. Refusal to acknowledge what's going on in the real world is not uncommon here in OmegaCanada.
all the anaphylaxis deaths in 1-2 days reactions
A rather grand statement. Do you have any numbers?
Man made nanoparticles are a concern, for sure. As well as the lipid nanoparticles you mention there are "Carbon-based nanoparticles, such as fullerenes, nanotubes, the oxides of metals such as iron and titanium, and natural inorganic compounds, including asbestos and quartz, can have biological effects on the environment and human health." They are in the air we breathe and the water we drink, and the ground we grow our food in.
However pretending "acquired immunity" means Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in a paper that makes no mention of the human immunodeficiency virus demonstrates clearly that you are out of your depth. You are free to believe it, of course, but no one has to take you seriously.
You show a tendency to string together unsupported opinions about a wide variety of topics given that this started with a mistaken statement about tapeworms and wound up at claiming something about AIDS based on a paper that doesn't mention it.
word games about who is considered "vaccinated"
You are free to maintain your position that someone who has lost their protection against the virus should still be counted as protected. Refusal to acknowledge what's going on in the real world is not uncommon here in OmegaCanada.
all the anaphylaxis deaths in 1-2 days reactions
A rather grand statement. Do you have any numbers?
Man made nanoparticles are a concern, for sure. As well as the lipid nanoparticles you mention there are "Carbon-based nanoparticles, such as fullerenes, nanotubes, the oxides of metals such as iron and titanium, and natural inorganic compounds, including asbestos and quartz, can have biological effects on the environment and human health." They are in the air we breathe and the water we drink, and the ground we grow our food in.
However pretendinga "acquired immunity" means Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in a paper that makes no mention of the human immunodeficiency virus demonstrates clearly that you are out of your depth. You are free to believe it, of course, but no one has to take you seriously.
You show a tendency to string together unsupported opinions about a wide variety of topics given that this started with a mistaken statement about tapeworms and wound up at claiming something about AIDS based on a paper that doesn't mention it.