Confidently incorrect on just about everything.

I'm reminded of those who say "If you can't beat them with brains try baffling them with bullshit."

A good example is linking to a paper about vaccines that says nothing about AIDS but claiming that it's relevant, and justifying that claim by linking to a page about AIDS and autoimmune diseases that makes no mention of vaccines.

You think you see a connection between vaccines and AIDS but it's only you so far. You can't find a paper to support your claim that there's a connection.

Confidently incorrect on just about everything.

I'm reminded of those who say "If you can't beat them with brains try baffling them with bullshit."

A good example is linking to a paper about vaccines that says nothing about AIDS but claiming that it's relevant, and justifying that claim by linking to a page about AIDS and autoimmune diseases that makes no mention of vaccines.

You think you see a connection between vaccines and AIDS but it's only you so far. You can't find a paper to support your claim that there's a connection.

Confidently incorrect on just about everything.

I'm reminded of those who say "If you can't beat them with brains try baffling them with bullshit."

A good example is linking to a paper about vaccines that says nothing about AIDS but claiming that it's relevant, and justifying that claim by linking to a page about AIDS and autoimmune diseases that makes no mention of vaccines.

You think you see a connection between vaccines and AIDS but it's only you. You can't find a paper to support your claim that there's a connection.