Parents don't have rights they have "responsibilities" but children have "rights". Rights pertains to standing or protections in law. He saying that parents do not have standing/protection in law in regards to their children but they do have resonsibilities or matters the the court will hold them accountable for in regards to their children. Whereas children do have rights in Canadian law. In essence the state has ultimate authority to dictate what happens with your children and parents have no standing before the court if the court decides otherwise.

Parents don't have rights they have "responsibilities" but children have "rights". Rights pertains to standing or protections in law. He saying that parents do not have standing/protection in law in regards to their children but they do have resonsibilities or matters the the court will hold them accountable for in regards to their children. Whereas children do have rights in Canadian law. In essence the state has ultimate authority to dictate what happens with your children and parents have no standing before the court.

Parents don't have rights they have "responsibilities" but children have "rights". Rights pertains to standing or protections in law. He saying that parents do not have standing/protection in law in regards to their children but they do have resonsibilities or matters the the court will hold them accountable for in regards to their children. Whereas children do have rights in Canadian law. In essence the state has ultimate authority to dictate what happens with your children an parents have no standing.

Parents don't have rights they have "responsibilities" but children have "rights". Rights pertains to standing in law. He saying that parents do not have standing in law in regards to their children but they do have resonsibilities that they can be held to account for before the court.