Lipstick on a pig folks.
Looks like the vast majority of the links are opinion pieces by non-experts.
I downloaded her PDF file. It's labelled "Covid Vaccine Studies and Findings"
I converted it to a text file for easily handling and gathered all the links into a single file. There are over 1500 of them.
That would be impressive if they were all studies, but they're not.
The first one I looked at - an actual study, that is, not something else (see below) - is supposed to support this statement: "We now have case reports, studies and autopsy findings showing that people suffering from post-jab myocarditis have mRNA-induced spike proteins in their hearts and blood.”
But the study did not mention myocarditis. Read it yourself.
Canadette 0 : studies 1
Things that are not "studies" mentioned in "Covid Vaccine Studies and Findings":
a tabloid news site,
a substack opinion from a non-expert - there are 629 substack links,
"independent" news reporting,
wordpress pieces,
at least one non-science doctor...
Well, you get the picture: more links than anyone can check out, a whole bunch of them that don't qualify as studies, and broken links - probably because this has been re-hashed for years.
Broken links from the couple dozen I checked:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
https://beforeitsnews.com/u-s-politics/2021/09/cellular-molecular-biologist-dr-christine-
https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2022/05/10/thousands-of-women-are-
https://brightlightnews.com/80-young-canadian-docs-died-since-vaccine-rollout-dr-makis-
https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-09-17-Correlation-Covid-
https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-09-17-Correlation-Covid-
Lipstick on a pig folks.
Looks like the vast majority of the links are opinion pieces by non-experts.
I downloaded her PDF file. It's labelled "Covid Vaccine Studies and Findings"
I converted it to a text file for easily handling and gathered all the links into a single file. There are over 1500 of them.
That would be impressive if they were all studies, but they're not.
The first one I looked at - an actual study, that is, not something else (see below) - is supposed to support this statement: "We now have case reports, studies and autopsy findings showing that people suffering from post-jab myocarditis have mRNA-induced spike proteins in their hearts and blood.”
But the study did not mention myocarditis. Read it yourself.
Canadette 0 : studies 1
Things that are not "studies" mentioned in "Covid Vaccine Studies and Findings":
a tabloid news site,
a substack opinion from a non-expert - there are lots of those,
"independent" news reporting,
wordpress pieces,
at least one non-science doctor...
Well, you get the picture: more links than anyone can check out, a whole bunch of them that don't qualify as studies, and broken links - probably because this has been re-hashed for years.
Broken links from the couple dozen I checked:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
https://beforeitsnews.com/u-s-politics/2021/09/cellular-molecular-biologist-dr-christine-
https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2022/05/10/thousands-of-women-are-
https://brightlightnews.com/80-young-canadian-docs-died-since-vaccine-rollout-dr-makis-
https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-09-17-Correlation-Covid-
https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-09-17-Correlation-Covid-