Yes.

Australia requires intermediate (near-fluent) English to be qualified for points in their immigration system, this is for all immigrants.

Canada gives points for basic beginner English, both federal skilled trades, and provincial nominee programs.

Thus, Australia's immigrants are far more likely to be fluent English speakers. Australia's immigrants are more likely to be higher income as well.

Of course we would never adjust the English (or French) requirements because the liberals and progressives would scream racism.

But of course, language and skill is only a part of the equation. Culture is a major factor, we know that cultural background determines their ability to assimilate, and it influences voting patterns.

Kelly Leitch proposed a Canadian values test, we need that, literally most European countries have that, but we're not allowed to have it in Canada because, again, racism. Norway and Denmark have a mandatory assimilation program, the same with Switzerland, they have to show they are assimilated.

But of course Leitch was painted as racist and all of that.

Yes.

Australia requires intermediate (near-fluent) English to be qualified for points in their immigration system, this is for all immigrants.

Canada gives points for basic beginner English, both federal skilled trades, and provincial nominee programs.

Thus, Australia's immigrants are far more likely to be fluent English speakers. Australia's immigrants are more likely to be higher income as well.

Of course we would never adjust the English (or French) requirements because the liberals and progressives would scream racism.

But of course, language and skill is only a part of the equation. Culture is a major factor, we know that cultural background determines their ability to assimilate, and it influences voting patterns.