I don't think he should, but I think he certainly can. It would probably be done using the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal legislation - which again, I think is bullshit and HRTs should be abolished. But as of now that is the precedent in Canada.

If HRTs can mandate the women in the workplace can't be forced to wear high heels but must be given the option to wear flats; that they can't be mandated to wear a skirt but must be given an option to wear pants; that Sikhs can't be mandated to be clean shaven; that Christians must be allowed to wear a small cross....... etc etc

HRTs can then certainly mandate something reasonable, like on all National Statuatory holidays and internationally recognized days of religious significance employees must be given an opportunity to show support of the holiday or not.

Again the definition would have to be reasonable. Wearing a poppy is reasonable. So is wearing a green shamrock for St. Pattys. Dressing up as a WWI soldier or a leprichon probably is not.

I don't think he should, but I think he certainly can. It would probably be done using the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal legislation - which again, I think is bullshit and HRTs should be abolished. But as of now that is the precedent in Canada.

If HRTs can mandate the women in the workplace can't be forced to wear high heels but must be given the option to wear flats; that they can't be mandated to wear a skirt but must be given an option to wear pants; that Sikhs can't be mandated to be clean shaven; that Christians must be allowed to wear a small cross....... etc etc

HRTs can then certainly mandate something reasonable, like on all ational Statuatory holidays and internationally recognized days of religious significance employees must be given an opportunity to show support of the holiday or not.

Again the definition would have to be reasonable. Wearing a poppy is reasonable. So is wearing a green shamrock for St. Pattys. Dressing up as a WWI soldier or a leprichon probably is not.