Again. Virtue signalling. The Supreme Court already ruled on it. The EO did nothing. It's like the EO he signed to protect people with preexisting conditions. It was already law before that.

The EO ensured that it cannot be repeated again. The Supreme Court sets precedent, but it does not make laws. It is the elected branches of government that makes laws.

Who sat there and did nothing while priests and pastors raped children across the globe? The Church. The downfall of the church was the church. Best example in Canada for this is Quebec.

You are, again, completely ignorant. The church has been investigating and persecuting these people, if you did any cursory research outside of mainstream media, particularly from Christian sources, you'd know that the grievances has sharply declined because orthodox (meaning, strict) Christians have been put to tasks in verifying these issues. These issues all started to spring up in the 1960's (the boomers, again, everything wrong began with them) when church hierarchy was liberalised and we had a bunch of liberals entering the clergy and fondling with children. The strict orthodox Christian institutions and followers have been largely responsible for reducing such incidences, its always the lenient clergy and priests who allow such things to continue. This is why I am far less enthused with lenient clergy in general, they allow such heinous actions to perpetuate.

Maistre called Protestants "the fatal ulcer" that has to be removed. He called non-Catholics blasphemers and wrote pieces about their executions. The executioner of these blasphemers was always portrait as an essential figure to social order.

Of course, the context is important, because England at the time was also persecuting Catholics, and protestantism did in fact damage the religious cohesion of Western Europe. This is where Edmund Burke is important, as he is both of Catholic, and Protestant background. The alternative was French Revolutionaries who went indiscriminately executing people who disagreed with them, or the hordes of Islamists under the Ottomans who a century earlier was stopped last minute in Vienna.

I bet Trump could rehearse more bible verses than you and I would be surprised if he could even come up with a single one.

Rehearsing Bible verses is not indicative of spiritual grace. Seriously? The apostles did not rehearse Bible verses, because the Bible wasn't even written during their time. My goodness! Early Christianity was mostly oral tradition, the scripture was not fully compiled until the 16th century.

Again. Virtue signalling. The Supreme Court already ruled on it. The EO did nothing. It's like the EO he signed to protect people with preexisting conditions. It was already law before that.

The EO ensured that it cannot be repeated again. The Supreme Court sets precedent, but it does not make laws. It is the elected branches of government that makes laws.

Who sat there and did nothing while priests and pastors raped children across the globe? The Church. The downfall of the church was the church. Best example in Canada for this is Quebec.

You are, again, completely ignorant. The church has been investigating and persecuting these people, if you did any cursory research outside of mainstream media, particularly from Christian sources, you'd know that the grievances has sharply declined because orthodox (meaning, strict) Christians have been put to tasks in verifying these issues. These issues all started to spring up in the 1960's (the boomers, again, everything wrong began with them) when church hierarchy was liberalised and we had a bunch of liberals entering the clergy and fondling with children. The strict orthodox Christian institutions and followers have been largely responsible for reducing such incidences, its always the lenient clergy and priests who allow such things to continue. This is why I am far less enthused with lenient clergy in general, they allow such heinous actions to perpetuate.

Maistre called Protestants "the fatal ulcer" that has to be removed. He called non-Catholics blasphemers and wrote pieces about their executions. The executioner of these blasphemers was always portrait as an essential figure to social order.

Of course, the context is important, because England at the time was also persecuting Catholics, and protestantism did in fact damage the religious cohesion of Western Europe. This is where Edmund Burke is important, as he is both of Catholic, and Protestant background. The alternative was French Revolutionaries who went indiscriminately executing people who disagreed with them, or the hordes of Islamists under the Ottomans who a century earlier was stopped last minute in Vienna.

I bet Trump could rehearse more bible verses than you and I would be surprised if he could even come up with a single one.

Rehearsing Bible verses is not indicative of spiritual grace. Seriously? The apostles did not rehearse Bible verses, because the Bible wasn't even written during their time. My goodness!