Win / OmegaCanada
OmegaCanada
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.
  1. 90% of the party are white nationalists - I doubt that. I suspect most are civic nationalists that are fine with white nationalism. That is not a negative view point. Both civic nationalism and white nationalism would benefit Canada.

  2. Nobody's qualified - In the last election the PPC person I voted for was the most qualified person on the ballot. I believe he had an MBA from LSE and owned a derivatives trading company.

  • On that note, doesn't the NDP throw teachers and social workers into their cabinets? Liberals hire people based on skin color and sex. We've seen how well that works out for Trudeau. Government would function fine under PPC.
  1. Speaking of Qanon believing, yellow-vested spergs, isn't MTG essentially that and she's doing a fine job from what I've heard of governing as a member of the US's congress. Not sure why you think Qanon/Yellow-vests would be any worse than Karen Teachers/Social Workers, Indoctrinated Ivy league out-of-touch morons that couldn't even do their own laundry or anti-white jokes in the conservative party? It's all the same shit, different color. If you seriously think the PPC wouldn't be able to govern due to lack of quality but the liberals or conservatives can govern then you're deep in the bullshit.
  • I can't believe you're seriously using the "we need politicians who know how to play politics to govern" argument. That's literally how the aristocracy keeps itself there because they've fooled you into believing only they can run things.
  1. $100k/yr/? Seem reasonable for a national party leader. I make more than that. Ham, you're falling for bullshit again. While you're caught up in conservative talking points about $100k/yr, the actual conservatives and liberals will waste hundreds of billions of dollars based on policy decisions. Stop getting distracted so easily. Focus on the stuff that matters. The actual policies these parties will implement and how they will impact Canadians. I could careless of New Zealand's Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, doesn't take a salary: she's still an authoritarian bitch whose policies are the worst of any western leader. I'd pay her a salary to retire because the damage she has caused is worse than the "savings" from her not taking a salary. I can't believe you actually care about these trivialities. They are 100% a distraction.
2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.
  1. 90% of the party are white nationalists - I doubt that. I suspect most are civic nationalists that are fine with white nationalism. That is not a negative view point. Both civic nationalism and white nationalism would benefit Canada.

  2. Nobody's qualified - In the last election the PPC person I voted for was the most qualified person on the ballot. I believe he had an MBA from LSE and owned a derivatives trading company.

  • On that note, doesn't the NDP throw teachers and social workers into their cabinets? Liberals hire people based on skin color and sex. We've seen how well that works out for Trudeau. Government would function fine under PPC.
  1. Speaking of Qanon believing, yellow-vested spergs, isn't MTG essentially that and she's going a fine job from what I've heard of government as a member of the US's congress. Not sure why you think Qanon/Yellow-vests would be any worse than Karen Teachers/Social Workers, Indoctrinated Ivy league out-of-touch morons that couldn't even do their own laundry or anti-white jokes in the conservative party? It's all the same shit, different color. If you seriously think the PPC wouldn't be able to govern due to lack of quality but the liberals or conservatives can govern then you're deep in the bullshit.
  • I can't believe you're seriously using the "we need politicians who know how to play politics to govern" argument. That's literally how the aristocracy keeps itself there because they've fooled you into believing only they can run things.
  1. $100k/yr/? Seem reasonable for a national party leader. I make more than that. Ham, you're falling for bullshit again. While you're caught up in conservative talking points about $100k/yr, the actual conservatives and liberals will waste hundreds of billions of dollars based on policy decisions. Stop getting distracted so easily. Focus on the stuff that matters. The actual policies these parties will implement and how they will impact Canadians. I could careless of New Zealand's Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, doesn't take a salary: she's still an authoritarian bitch whose policies are the worst of any western leader. I'd pay her a salary to retire because the damage she has caused is worse than the "savings" from her not taking a salary. I can't believe you actually care about these trivialities. They are 100% a distraction.
2 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original
  1. 90% of the party are white nationalists - I doubt that. I suspect most are civic nationalists that are fine with white nationalism. That is not a negative view point. Both civic nationalism and white nationalism would benefit Canada.

  2. Nobody's qualified - In the last election the PPC person I voted for was the most qualified person on the ballot. I believe he had an MBA from LSE and owned a derivatives trading company.

On that note, doesn't the NDP throw teachers and social workers into their cabinets? Liberals hire people based on skin color and sex. We've seen how well that works out for Trudeau. Government would function fine under PPC.

  1. Speaking of Qanon believing, yellow-vested spergs, isn't MTG essentially that and she's going a fine job from what I've heard of government as a member of the US's congress. Not sure why you think Qanon/Yellow-vests would be any worse than Karen Teachers/Social Workers, Indoctrinated Ivy league out-of-touch morons that couldn't even do their own laundry or anti-white jokes in the conservative party? It's all the same shit, different color. If you seriously think the PPC wouldn't be able to govern due to lack of quality but the liberals or conservatives can govern then you're deep in the bullshit.

I can't believe you're seriously using the "we need politicians who know how to play politics to govern" argument. That's literally how the aristocracy keeps itself there because they've fooled you into believing only they can run things.

  1. $100k/yr/? Seem reasonable for a national party leader. I make more than that. Ham, you're falling for bullshit again. While you're caught up in conservative talking points about $100k/yr, the actual conservatives and liberals will waste hundreds of billions of dollars based on policy decisions. Stop getting distracted so easily. Focus on the stuff that matters. The actual policies these parties will implement and how they will impact Canadians. I could careless of New Zealand's Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, doesn't take a salary: she's still an authoritarian bitch whose policies are the worst of any western leader. I'd pay her a salary to retire because the damage she has caused is worse than the "savings" from her not taking a salary. I can't believe you actually care about these trivialities. They are 100% a distraction.
2 years ago
1 score