The above opinion is written from the same gullible individual who:

• fell for the claims of safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial

• links unscientific methodologies and fraudulent data from a 2021 study where “SUSPECTED covid cases” were counted as PCR confirmed cases. See here -> https://omegacanada.win/p/15Hv76wnOj/x/c/4OYXXQImXR2

• does not have basic knowledge to explain the difference between ‘absolute risk’ and ‘relative risk’. (thus explaining her gullibility)

• and keeps posting fraudulent studies that contain 1) fictitious or estimated outcomes 2) suspected covid cases that get counted as confirmed covid cases, 3) hides the covid infection rates after Dec 2021 and excludes recent breakthrough cases in the fully vaccinated after Dec 2021. 4) only uses data from sept 2020 to Aug 2021 when EVERYONE unvaccinated

The above opinion is written from the same gullible individual who:

• fell for the claims of safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial

• thinks linking a fraudulent study with “suspected covid cases” that pretends they are confirmed is scientific!! LOL

• does not have basic knowledge to explain the difference between ‘absolute risk’ and ‘relative risk’. (thus explaining her gullibility)

• and keeps posting fraudulent studies that contain 1) fictitious or estimated outcomes 2) suspected covid cases that get counted as confirmed covid cases, 3) hides the covid infection rates after Dec 2021 and excludes recent breakthrough cases in the fully vaccinated after Dec 2021. 4) only uses data from sept 2020 to Aug 2021 when EVERYONE unvaccinated