Here's another example of V&C1 twisting the tale. V&C1 says the health facility admitted "they were wrong to mandate the shots", but the court case was about the hospital's blanket policy dis-allowing religious exemptions.

As a result of the court case the hospital will now consider each request for a religious exemption individually.

The case was about religious exemptions, not vaccine mandates.

You have to double-check everything V&C1 tells you. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/northshore-reaches-10-3m-settlement-in-vaccine-mandate-case.html

Here's another example of V&C1 twisting the tale. V&C1 says the health facility admitted "they were wrong to mandate the shots", but the court case was about the hospital's blanket policy dis-allowing religious exemptions.

As a result of the court case the hospital will now consider each request for a religious exemption individually.

The case was about religious exemptions, not vaccine mandates.

You have to double-check everything V&C1 tells you.