"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdowns.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000
Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. It's half the risk assessment and completely ignoring the other half with a dumb statement. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how CTV news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdowns.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000
Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. It's half the risk assessment and completely ignoring the other half with a dumb statement. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how the news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdowns.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000
Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. It's half the risk assessment. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how the news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdows.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000
Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. It's half the risk assessment. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how the news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdows.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000
Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how the news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.
I did my best, considering that governments don't give us full vaccine injury breakdows.
This is how you present the risk, though:
Vaccines have saved such-and-such number of people per 100,000 Vaccine risk: safe and effective
This also IS NOT comparing apples-to-apples. This is have faith in the Pfizer religion because I say so. I understand, though - This is how the news presents it to you and you can't think for yourself.
"Trust the science" is akin to "have faith" in religions.
The way I presented the risk is how it should be presented to any intelligent person. If you don't understand this, that's your problem.