He is actually technically right. He did not call them names. He used insulting adjectives. So no perjury.

There is a distinction. For example: he is a misogynist vs. he is misogynistic

I am not defending Trudy. But the lawyer who was examining him should have had better command of the facts and confronted him with what he said, leaving him no wiggle room.

He is actually technically right. He did not call them names. He used insulting adjectives. So no perjury.

There is a distinction. For example: he is a misogynist vs. he is misogynistic

I am not defending him Trudy. But the lawyer who was examining him should have had better command of the facts and confronted him with what he said, leaving him no wiggle room.