Win / OmegaCanada
OmegaCanada
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Tuchodi used to claim that covid had a 1% death rate ( up to just a few months ago).

After i corrected himon it, he changed his tune to, “if you have a positive covid test, you have a 1% chance of dying.”

I tried to get him to explain and he keeps pointing to stats like these.

These are legit stats. But only a retard would claim, based on these stats, that you have a 1% chance of dying following a positive covid test.

Here’s the explanation of how to interpret the stats that you point to - These are historical stats. People that died and were suspected of having covid were tested, if they hadn’t already been, making the numerator relatively accurate. The denominator doesn’t include the massive number of people that had covid but never got an official test, making the denominator way off. The denominator is way off, making the actual death rate a fraction of these stats

This isn’t even something farfetched. We’re talking the most basic of interpreting stats, which you only need to be slightly smarter than a retard to do, making Tuchodi an actual retard.

But Tuchodi, since you kept deflecting the first time i called you out on this bullshit and you’re unable to rationalize your claim, cite just one credible expert, a doctor, a scientist, a researcher, in the last two years that claimed this 1% bullshit that you do to this day and then I’ll take back my retard label for you. After all, you’re big on citing sources anyway.

267 days ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Tuchodi used to claim that covid had a 1% death rate ( up to just a few months ago).

After i corrected himon it, he changed his tune to, “if you have a positive covid test, you have a 1% chance of dying.”

I tried to get him to explain and he keeps pointing to stats like these.

These are legit stats. But only a retard would claim, based on these stats, that you have a 1% chance of dying following a positive covid test.

Here’s the explanation of how to interpret the stats that you point to - These are historical stats. Most people that died and were suspected of having covid were tested, if they hadn’t already been, making the numerator relatively accurate. The denominator doesn’t include the massive number of people that had covid but never got an official test, making the denominator way off. The denominator is way off, making the actual death rate a fraction of these stats

This isn’t even something farfetched. We’re talking the most basic of interpreting stats, which you only need to be slightly smarter than a retard to do, making Tuchodi an actual retard.

But Tuchodi, since you kept deflecting the first time i called you out on this bullshit and you’re unable to rationalize your claim, cite just one credible expert, a doctor, a scientist, a researcher, in the last two years that claimed this 1% bullshit that you do to this day and then I’ll take back my retard label for you. After all, you’re big on citing sources anyway.

267 days ago
1 score