Dismissing the NY Post
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states
You seem unaware of the political realities in the US. The "blue fed gov policies" provide support, and the reds want to remove it: Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority, and "Republicans have repeatedly pushed to cut, privatize, or even end Social Security"
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning it to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.
Dismissing the NY Post
I repeat: "an extraordinary response to a global pandemic does not fit into the routine nature of your claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support". Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the use of "often"."
By sending tax money to blue states blue leaders are robbing the poor of red states
See above. Let's have some day-to-day examples to justify the claim that "Red states by nature are often denied financial support".
The overall argument regarding why red states are denied services to address poverty
That's explained in the book you referenced: "The red states follow the conservative bent of less is better. Less government, less taxation, less money for education, health, road repairs and pollution controls make for a Republican paradise."
In the end it's the fault of blue fed gov policies that end up causing excessive child abuse claims in red states
You seem unaware of the political realities in the US. The "blue fed gov policies" provide support, and the reds want to remove it: Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority, and "Republicans have repeatedly pushed to cut, privatize, or even end Social Security"
By causing gas prices to rise it is an attack on the poor. The federal governments should address this inequity.
Pierre Trudeau - a "blue" politician - set up Petro-Canada as a crown corporation in 1975 in an attempt to do just that. A "red" government under Brian Mulroney started the process of returning to private industry in 1991. Look it up. And in the States the idea of government interference in the free market is seen as socialism by most and communist by some.