And they wonder why electric vehicles aren't selling.
They bankrupted America. The chickens just haven't come to roost yet.
Look up president Carter and the OPEC struggles of 1978 - 1982. The idiots who run these shows are replaying that playbook to tap some untapped stimulus.
So you don't have evidence just the leadstories article.
You are the one questioning the veracity of the claims. Leadstories is not a reliable source for your evidence. I used it as an example of a stalinesque rewriting of the historical notes from 100 years ago, which you conveniently ignore.
The leadstories team have no way of knowing. They obviously made it up. There's no citation to their article, so you are spreading misinformation. Hall, Walsh and Green noted their opinions but still no medical records. Hall 'said' medical records showed but provided no evidence.
Interesting that the vaccines were implicated in the death of a future progeny of the yurko family charged with "shaken baby syndrome":
Do you have evidence of the medical files for a 13 year old from 100 years ago? How did you get permission?
Or was that made up?
It was her father that blamed the vaccines and started a massive movement to educate people of the dangers, not me: -------https://www.myhorrynews.com/news/local/loris/looking-back-the-untold-story-of-raggedy-ann/article_57036736-5310-11e4-9a53-0017a43b2370.html --------excerpt He began drawing Raggedy Ann with a storyline, and in 1915, a patent and trademark was granted to market the doll. He watched Marcella play with her doll for hours, which became the inspiration for “The Tales of Raggedy Ann.”
Seeing the love his daughter had for the doll warmed his soul. Unfortunately, the two playmates would soon be separated by death, and a father would lose his muse.
Saying ‘goodbye’
The Gruelle family became outspoken adversaries of vaccine use in public schools. At the time, children and parents had no choice but to accept the series of shots, given to them during school hours, to prevent the small pox illness. Gruelle’s association with “Physical Culture” Magazine gave him the platform necessary to voice his opinion of vaccination, which was stern and unapologetic, to say the least.
Soon after his daughter’s 13th birthday, she was given the series of vaccines in school. She became ill from the shots that proved to be fatal. Alan R Yurko, CPPCC, Sc. of the Idaho Observer said, “Marcella’s death was not an immediate reaction. She died a very slow and subtle death. In the months after her unconsented inoculation, she became lethargic and lost her appetite. Marcella became feverish, fatigued and hypotonic [loss of muscle control] as her body and nervous system fought hard against the poisons forced into her bloodstream. At the end, she was as limp as a ragdoll.”
Her death sparked an outrage within the family and community. Gruelle was asked to comment on his feelings regarding her death in “Physical Culture” Magazine and he drew his famous cartoon of a monster holding a scale.
Under the satire, Gruelle printed, “Having recently lost our only daughter through vaccination (in public school, without our consent), you may realize how terribly HUMOROUS the subject of vaccination appears to Mrs. Gruelle and myself. Of the seven physicians called in on the case, six pronounced it in emphatic terms MALPRACICE. The seventh did not commit himself, being the head of the school board and a firm advocate of vaccination.”
Moving forward
In 1922, Gruella honored his daughter by marketing the doll with Marshall Field, and publishing “Raggedy Ann Stories” with P.F. Volland Company. Although her hair changed to a bright red, the doll kept its charm and whimsical design. He eventually added a brother to her story, named Raggedy Andy, which became a beloved storyline. He dedicated his life to making others smile.
In the 1800s small pox killed 100s of thousands. After the vaccines it killed 200 million+:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_smallpox
Prior to the first successful vaccine for smallpox in 1959 there had been a long questionable series of vaccines that were problematic:
The vaccines prior to 1959 and the who's rollout of a higher quality version, vaccines were often deadly, as in the case of the raggedy Anne creator dedicating his books to the memory of his daughter (the books can be found on archive.org and dedication is clear in those texts). Not the doll itself but the doll was used in later anti Vax efforts by the author.
The bell curve folks can only feel smart through consensus with the herd.
Otherwise they would have to look in the mirror and realize they were just mid intellects being used to further an agenda.
The closer to the bottom the more militant they were. Beware the aggressive agenda followers.
The world is a vampire:
https://genius.com/The-smashing-pumpkins-bullet-with-butterfly-wings-lyrics
Yes exactly audiences just see two arguments and value each equally which is why a liberal won't argue on merits but use what-abouts or shoot the messenger (ad hominim) to try to devalue a reference or your point of view.
Best to just say their arguments are dumb and any child can see it if they only had half a brain
Hamsamwich hasn't been here for a year. Seems the coincidence may have got him.
The other two are on reduced hours. Seems they are being reassigned or just lost their willpower because if you don't have faith everything is a challenge to maintain.
Besides it's not worth the effort to debate them they are liberals and incapable of debate. Your best form of discourse is ridicule.
You can be Canadian and have a view of the party in power. Look at how radical Peter C Neumann and Trudeau Sr were to the Diefenbaker government.
They wrote many very contentious things about that government through Cite Libre and the Neumann articles. In Canada you aren't ruled by a party in power because the party is not the ruler of the land like a tyrant but serve the public sentiment. They need consensus amongst the parliament and Senate to form a series of laws to manage. If polls show the party has consensus of the people I would say it's a measure of the public support to lead in such a way.
The sentiment is key. Last I saw the liberals have lost the public will and are in a challenging position where any unconstitutional activities may lead to a new government deciding to take constitutional action and boomerang.
The radical discussion is more just a function of a method of words. Liberals want to paint their political enemies as radicals rather than compete in the politician sphere where they are losing the will of the people to govern.
Refering to their failures is not radical. Jailing and debanking your political enemies is if the actions are unconstitutional as was the case I noted.
https://www.cbc.ca/history/EPISCONTENTSE1EP16CH1PA4LE.html
Liberals were always and forever the radicals. Always quick to overrule sovereign rights.
CPC want to turn back the clock of overreach by the liberals and turn the government back into a representative rather than authoritative tyrannical socialist nanny state.
Only one party used excessive force in subjugation of Canadians and that is the liberals.
If the majority rule for a party, they have a mandate. A minority government propped up by a coalition is so rare in Canada.
Both cases for the emergency act are considered unconstitutional and is the definition of "radical".
The government had to rewrite the war measures act because of the way Trudeau Sr abused his power by a backdoor invocation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539940/
The term "long COVID" seems to have been crowd sourced.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/covid-19-internment-camps-disinformation-1.5769592
They never talked about internment.
How much you want to bet he or someone he loves was molested by a priest?
https://www.edweek.org/leadership/sexual-abuse-by-educators-is-scrutinized/2004/03
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/forgotten-study-abuse-in-school-100-times-worse-than-by-priests/
More likely a teacher, so what is your next excuse for burning churches? Could there be some connection to the story of the residential schools inflaming the population against the church?
Probably so.
Wait a minute, won't the capital gains tax take it from the top 1% and give it to us all?
Why not write that in the bill?