AP guidelines are basically anti-white handbook. In order to be published/carried by the AP, which is almost hte only way to get published as a journalist today, you need to meet their guidelines. If you notice change in newsspeak over the years, like no more "illegal aliens/refugee" (use of the word illegal - no one is illegal, etc) or "Black" vs "white" for skin colour (capitalized vs lowercase - dehumanizing one group), these are official AP guidelines everyone is required to follow. So, your local newspaper needs to fill in 20 pages of their publication. They go to AP and buy articles to publish and they are all written to these standards.

For example, here's a short article they posted on race - https://www.apstylebook.com/race-related-coverage

Some notes when discussing racist, racism, racially motivated/charged, etc:

Mississippi has a history of racist lynchings, not a history of racially motivated lynchings. He is charged in the racist massacre of nine people at a Black church, not the racially motivated massacre of nine people at a Black church.

All white on black examples.

Caucasian Avoid as a synonym for white

Gee, I wonder why you would avoid that.

Black(s), white(s) (n.) Do not use either term as a singular noun. For plurals, phrasing such as Black people, white people, Black teachers, white students is often preferable when clearly relevant. White officers account for 64% of the police force, Black officers 21% and Latino officers 15%. The gunman targeted Black churchgoers.

They go out of their way to tell them to use Black and white (lowercase). The examples immediately following cant help but show you the difference - Latino. Black. Black churchgoers. Black people. white people. Black teachers. white students. Also note how blacks are the ones targeted with implication of only black victims and implied white attackers. Blacks are also the dominant and knowledgable teacher while white are students and need to learn from blacks. This is the language they use to teach people their guidelines and entier books of this shit exist and are mandatory to have an article picked up by them.

reverse discrimination A term sometimes used to describe bias or perceived bias against majority groups. Limit its use to quotes; generally just discrimination will suffice to describe such allegations or practices.

If you havent noticed, they are basically saying reverse discrimination does not and cannot exist. It is only an allegation at best. Its a perceived bias. Only use when forced to in a quote.

The West is asking for it because “muh colonialism”