Secure the supreme court and lower courts with conservatives judges. Get RBG spot right before the election ?. Gather evidence knowing that the election voting fraud will happen. Take it to the courts and expose the corruption system to the sheeple.
Sure its scary right now....I guess thats why Daddy is in control because the children can’t see the forest past the trees ? ? TRUMP 2020
Yeah, that's why it was so important that Amy Coney Barret got confirmed BEFORE the election, not after. Presidential election disputes go straight to the supreme court. Let's just hope the Trump team had the forethought to position assets to collect adequate evidence of election fraud.
Yeah I think the SCOTUS arbitration of the election will be like a civil lawsuit type case where the preponderance of evidence is what matters i.e. whichever side has the most evidence wins.
But when it comes to the criminal case against the people who rigged the election, you'll need the evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this individual committed this crime, and that's where they'll probably manage to cover their tracks.
But they have nothing to lose election-wise by at least trying. So long as they cover their tracks sufficiently to avoid criminal liability.
Secure the supreme court and lower courts with conservatives judges. Get RBG spot right before the election ?. Gather evidence knowing that the election voting fraud will happen. Take it to the courts and expose the corruption system to the sheeple.
Sure its scary right now....I guess thats why Daddy is in control because the children can’t see the forest past the trees ? ? TRUMP 2020
Yeah, that's why it was so important that Amy Coney Barret got confirmed BEFORE the election, not after. Presidential election disputes go straight to the supreme court. Let's just hope the Trump team had the forethought to position assets to collect adequate evidence of election fraud.
I feel like statistical evidence alone is sufficient in some instances. More evidence the better though and there’s quite a bit online already
Yeah I think the SCOTUS arbitration of the election will be like a civil lawsuit type case where the preponderance of evidence is what matters i.e. whichever side has the most evidence wins.
But when it comes to the criminal case against the people who rigged the election, you'll need the evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this individual committed this crime, and that's where they'll probably manage to cover their tracks.
But they have nothing to lose election-wise by at least trying. So long as they cover their tracks sufficiently to avoid criminal liability.