Yeah, that's why it was so important that Amy Coney Barret got confirmed BEFORE the election, not after. Presidential election disputes go straight to the supreme court. Let's just hope the Trump team had the forethought to position assets to collect adequate evidence of election fraud.
Yeah I think the SCOTUS arbitration of the election will be like a civil lawsuit type case where the preponderance of evidence is what matters i.e. whichever side has the most evidence wins.
But when it comes to the criminal case against the people who rigged the election, you'll need the evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this individual committed this crime, and that's where they'll probably manage to cover their tracks.
But they have nothing to lose election-wise by at least trying. So long as they cover their tracks sufficiently to avoid criminal liability.
Barret already ruled against Trump in a crucial court ruling about the ballot counting.
She's a deep-state puppet.
No one is this corrupt system is going to go to bat for Trump. They've already laid the narrative that he "won't accept the results"... Anything he does now will just be perceived as sour grapes
Yeah, that's why it was so important that Amy Coney Barret got confirmed BEFORE the election, not after. Presidential election disputes go straight to the supreme court. Let's just hope the Trump team had the forethought to position assets to collect adequate evidence of election fraud.
I feel like statistical evidence alone is sufficient in some instances. More evidence the better though and there’s quite a bit online already
Yeah I think the SCOTUS arbitration of the election will be like a civil lawsuit type case where the preponderance of evidence is what matters i.e. whichever side has the most evidence wins.
But when it comes to the criminal case against the people who rigged the election, you'll need the evidence to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this individual committed this crime, and that's where they'll probably manage to cover their tracks.
But they have nothing to lose election-wise by at least trying. So long as they cover their tracks sufficiently to avoid criminal liability.
I still don't know if you're a total moron or just a low IQ troll. GG
Barret already ruled against Trump in a crucial court ruling about the ballot counting.
She's a deep-state puppet.
No one is this corrupt system is going to go to bat for Trump. They've already laid the narrative that he "won't accept the results"... Anything he does now will just be perceived as sour grapes
That's the problem with the supreme court. We have 3 hyper-partisan corrupt DEM judges with no regards for the constitution, and 6 unknowns.