Your comment does not address my point at all. I made no mention of the violations of the constitution. I simply noted a difference between attempting to use the state to address personal grievances and organising private entities to address grievances.

And by the way, your statement that a business can do whatever it wants to do as long as it does not violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is nonsensical. The Charter does not apply to private entities. It limits government action and gives citizens certain freedoms and rights that cannot generally be abrogated by governments. In addition, there are many laws and regulations, including human rights laws, that limit what business can do. So businesses can not do whatever they want regardless of the Charter.