I'll tell you what - you provide a shred of proof of your claims, and then I'll entertain them.
Until then you're just concocting fantasies in your own head, and then believing them like they're real, based on nothing at all. That's what crazy people do.
I'll tell you what - you provide a shred of proof of your claims, and then I'll entertain them.
Until then you're just concocting fantasies in your own head, and then believing them like they're real, based on nothing at all. That's what crazy people do.
Where's your proof that the vote counts were altered?
That's right, it doesn't exist. You don't even have any statistical evidence to show that.
"deleted the ballots and used vulnerable machines" is not proof, it's just innuendo. From there you can only presume votes were stolen.
I didn't say they weren't vulnerable, I'm asking what proof you have that the vote was rigged.
Vulnerability isn't proof that abuse occurred. It's just proof that it was possible for abuse to have occurred.
What indication is there that the abuse did occur?