Indeed. The gag order serves absolutely no purpose here and was made most likely to prevent him from encouraging others or seeking funding. The gag order should not withstand a charter challenge, and any reasonable judge rendering a proper judgement would overturn the gag order. And I’d like to see the crown argue the gag order is justified under s. 1. It would be a most ridiculous argument.
Indeed. The gag order serves absolutely no purpose here and was made most likely to prevent him from encouraging others or seeking funding. The gag order should not withstand a charter challenge, and any reasonable judge rendering a proper judgement would overturn the gag order. And I’d like to see the crown argue the gag order is justified under s. 1. It would be a most ridiculous argument.