So the fact that I didn't know the location of some total stranger at this very moment (why would I?) is proof that he's being detained by the authorities? Are you serious? This is how your mind works? This is your definition of "rational"?
I don't know where John Travolta is at this very moment either. Is that proof that he's under arrest too? Or is the reason I don't know where he is more likely to be that he's a total stranger who's location I don't keep track of?
Now, where is your evidence that Hunter is in police custody? Don't answer with another stupid evasive question. Show your proof.
I don't need any evidence of that. People not being under arrest is the default assumption. You're the one claiming he's been arrested. Therefore you're the one who has to substantiate your own claim.
So are you once again refusing to provide a shred of evidence to support your claims?
So the fact that I didn't know the location of some total stranger at this very moment (why would I?) is proof that he's being detained by the authorities? Are you serious? This is how your mind works? This is your definition of "rational"?
I don't know where John Travolta is at this very moment either. Is that proof that he's under arrest too? Or is the reason I don't know where he is more likely to be that he's a total stranger who's location I don't keep track of?
Now, where is your evidence that Hunter is in police custody? Don't answer with another stupid evasive question. Show your proof.
I don't need any evidence of that. People not being under arrest is the default assumption. You're the one claiming he's been arrested. Therefore you're the one who has to substantiate your own claim.
So are you once again refusing to provide a shred of evidence to support your claims?
That's not a secret.
So where's the evidence that Q anon is real?
I've asked you repeatedly, and all you've done is dance around it.
If you can't provide a shred of proof that Q anon is real, why do you believe in him?