Another failed lockdown experiment: french curfew didn't contain the virus - OmegaCanada

Another failed lockdown experiment: french curfew didn't contain the virus (archive.is) ☭ ChinaVirus ☣︎

posted 3 years ago by infamouset 3 years ago by infamouset +27 / -0

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– LeftyMcleftface 1 point 3 years ago +3 / -2

Let's assume for the sake of argument that COVID is real, is as infectious as advertised and can kill or seriously damage people's organs as we've been led to believe. I know a lot of you don't believe any of this, but for the sake of argument...

What would you do to solve the problem? I hear you guys rail against lockdowns constantly because you don't like them, but what is your actual solution? Tax cuts? The Free market magically making COVID go away? Or would you just ignore it and let people die because of some Ayn Rand survival of the fittest bullshit?

I'm serious, if you were in charge what would you do to protect people from COVID?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

▲ -2 ▼

– LeftyMcleftface -2 points 3 years ago +1 / -3

Last time I checked on the stats COVID is eleven times more deadly than the flu and 2.25 x more infectious, which doesn't sound like a whole lot until you factor in the exponential rate of spread.

Both of those factors, but ESPECIALLY the latter one make it much more dangerous.

As I said in this post

https://omegacanada.win/p/11S0NirzGj/x/c/4DuUUByR28n

after 10 infection cycles with the average seasonal flu a total of approximately 12 people would have been infected. With COVID 19 that number would be 37,916.

So even if the death rate of COVID were the same as the flu, which it isn't, it'd still be more deadly just because it has the ability to infect far more people.

permalink parent save report block reply