This decision feels like another R. v Daviault situation. Every car manufactured without a breathalyser interlock built in by default is failing to prevent drunk driving in exactly the same way that failing to make every gun with an authorised user interlock does.
Someone injured by a drunk driver really ought to take a run at the manufacturer over not including a breathalyser. This decision can't be struck down soon enough.
Let's sue manufactures of white vans too.
Those have done some damage as well.
Why stop at just those? From now on when ever we get into a car accident we should be able to sue the car manufacturer.
The family of that Fast and the Furious dude did exactly that.
They sued Porsche. I don't know what the conclusion was though.
I want to sue a mountain. The wrong Trudeau died in the avalanche.
This decision feels like another R. v Daviault situation. Every car manufactured without a breathalyser interlock built in by default is failing to prevent drunk driving in exactly the same way that failing to make every gun with an authorised user interlock does.
Someone injured by a drunk driver really ought to take a run at the manufacturer over not including a breathalyser. This decision can't be struck down soon enough.