The 'vision' you mention resonated better back in those days, but the rhetoric ultimately contributed to the expansion of the welfare state.
This is why I find Sowell to be so much more illuminating, he always starts with a sober review of the human condition and the limitations of finite resources and human capital. Taking these into consideration reveals that there are only tradeoffs, there are no magic solutions. We have to decide which imperfect society we want.
"Judge a person by their character" is about as utopian as " Free school and healthcare for all" when you think about it. Nobody wants to be discriminated against, but it's part of being a social creature and like racism, abuse, etc it can never be eradicated without annihilating all of humanity.
If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?
No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.
We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.
There's more in the link, but if you find a working video of it, youll see the passion and conviction of his oration skills that allowed him to become leader of Germany. Compare it to the word salads of Trudeau speaking moistly or geriatric stupor of Biden today if you get the chance. But the point is I doubt anyone would truly disagree with anything hes saying about women and men and how they are not supposed to be antagonistic to one another. How one must protect and safeguard while the other must nurture and care for and educate. How each is jsut as important as the other and in balance with nature. Most people have never actually read or heard a single word from hitler outside of movies and that meme video. They just assume its rambling nonstop about jews and blacks and race.
Ideological consistency isnt the left's forte.
Look at Robespierre for example. Started out as a man 'for the common folk' and ended up as a corrupt bloodthirsty tyrant.
Robespierre's vision will be here again courtesy of globalists.
The 'vision' you mention resonated better back in those days, but the rhetoric ultimately contributed to the expansion of the welfare state.
This is why I find Sowell to be so much more illuminating, he always starts with a sober review of the human condition and the limitations of finite resources and human capital. Taking these into consideration reveals that there are only tradeoffs, there are no magic solutions. We have to decide which imperfect society we want.
"Judge a person by their character" is about as utopian as " Free school and healthcare for all" when you think about it. Nobody wants to be discriminated against, but it's part of being a social creature and like racism, abuse, etc it can never be eradicated without annihilating all of humanity.
Hitler's speeches are amazing and I doubt anyone would disagree with his views. Take his speech on womanhood/feminity:
There's more in the link, but if you find a working video of it, youll see the passion and conviction of his oration skills that allowed him to become leader of Germany. Compare it to the word salads of Trudeau speaking moistly or geriatric stupor of Biden today if you get the chance. But the point is I doubt anyone would truly disagree with anything hes saying about women and men and how they are not supposed to be antagonistic to one another. How one must protect and safeguard while the other must nurture and care for and educate. How each is jsut as important as the other and in balance with nature. Most people have never actually read or heard a single word from hitler outside of movies and that meme video. They just assume its rambling nonstop about jews and blacks and race.
They say that if Hitler died right before WWII, he would've been considered the greatest German patriot who ever lived.
"I'm fucking for god!" - Marchin' Lootin' Coon Jr.
It was never about equality or racism. Its about eroding and eliminating the roots of liberty and freedom from our heritage.