Agreed. She said she was trying to get her money out, so she could switch banks, however, you could also make the argument that you need to be clothed (shirt and shoes) in order to make transactions there as well.
Then the rule has nothing to do with health or safety as they proclaim.
If they want to hopscotch their way of interpretational arbitrary rules then let's not pretend that they have any legitimate grief with customers about their health or safety and just call it like it is. Tyranny.
Because they full out admit that it has nothing to do with a virus or any kind of health and safety premise since they choose to enforce an entirely different set of rules in attempt to gain compliance.
If anything is a public property it is the bank.
Who's money is it?
Agreed. She said she was trying to get her money out, so she could switch banks, however, you could also make the argument that you need to be clothed (shirt and shoes) in order to make transactions there as well.
Then the rule has nothing to do with health or safety as they proclaim.
If they want to hopscotch their way of interpretational arbitrary rules then let's not pretend that they have any legitimate grief with customers about their health or safety and just call it like it is. Tyranny.
Because they full out admit that it has nothing to do with a virus or any kind of health and safety premise since they choose to enforce an entirely different set of rules in attempt to gain compliance.
They're trying to undo rosa parks.
Excellent points my man.