Last I checked Bernier isn't taking money from taxpayers by force
Actually he is. He's making his full MP pension, which is funded by money forcibly taken from taxpayers. The money he's paying himself from party donations is on top of that.
Yeah but that has nothing to do with the PPC. If you cared about government corruption you might want to start with Erin and the boys at the CPC. I am sure they get a bit off the top for protecting supply management.
Any politician that supports climate alarmism and the destruction of Canada's resource industry is at best ideologically compromised, but also could be on the take from lobbyists, working as an agent of a foreign interest or even just being a grifter profiting off of foundations and charities (Example 1, Trudeau, J)
Any politician that supports climate alarmism and the destruction of Canada's resource industry is at best ideologically compromised
So what does a politician who's opposed to all of that do when the vast majority of the electorate want it? Just keep campaigning against and keep losing? How do you get to make your beliefs on the matter policy id you never get elected?
That's the problem. You guys don't understand how the game is played. That's why you're stuck at 2% support. You're putting principle above strategy. And principle alone can't win you elections when most of the electorate disagree with you.
Actually he is. He's making his full MP pension, which is funded by money forcibly taken from taxpayers. The money he's paying himself from party donations is on top of that.
Yeah but that has nothing to do with the PPC. If you cared about government corruption you might want to start with Erin and the boys at the CPC. I am sure they get a bit off the top for protecting supply management.
And you can prove O'Toole is involved in corruption?
Any politician that supports climate alarmism and the destruction of Canada's resource industry is at best ideologically compromised, but also could be on the take from lobbyists, working as an agent of a foreign interest or even just being a grifter profiting off of foundations and charities (Example 1, Trudeau, J)
So what does a politician who's opposed to all of that do when the vast majority of the electorate want it? Just keep campaigning against and keep losing? How do you get to make your beliefs on the matter policy id you never get elected?
That's the problem. You guys don't understand how the game is played. That's why you're stuck at 2% support. You're putting principle above strategy. And principle alone can't win you elections when most of the electorate disagree with you.
https://i.imgur.com/TwIedao.png