Im just curious if anyone has any ideas here.
My GF is essentially being forced to get the shot with the threat of termination. Her boss told her that they will be requiring everyone to get vaccinated because his wife is slowly dying and he doesnt want to get her more sick. She loves her job, and doesnt want to leave. We've already dodged the bullet once after her boss made her book an appointment at work then told her he would drive her to the appointment before her shift. She has a hard time standing up for herself and almost gave in. I was able to change her mind... but now theyre saying that it will be mandatory by the end of the summer.
Ive been doing research and apparently they do have grounds to terminate an employee for denying the shot. Unless its on the grounds of medical/religious exemption. Right now the medical exemption is out the window, but im still grasping at straws that a religious exemption will work. We just dont know how to move forward with this route. She wants to avoid legal routes because money is an issue.
She thinks that if she gets the shot, her job will be saved and it would be less stress and everyone will be happy with her. But she knows 100% that she doesnt want it. Shes only considering giving in because the pressure and stress is getting to her. Once she gets the shot her parents will stop harassing her, her boss will stop harassing her. Etc.
It seems like Ive searched everywhere for an answer and i cant find one. Hopefully she just quits that bullshit job and finds one with patriots who actually give a shit about freedom of choice.
We have to encourage business executives to be held to the Nuremberg Code. The principles are being violated through the private sector. Justice and accountability have to happen.
On the subject of the Nuremberg Code, it absolutely applies in Canada especially in connection with the charter. Private sector contracts are only enforceable when within agreement with the charter. Canada's Supreme Court has held that treaties signed, and even not ratified, are subject to charter scrutiny. Therefore the Nuremberg Code is a tangentially binding document in Canadian tort law, and even criminal law.
Copy Pasta Proof:
A medical procedure or treatment is anything that affects your medical health, whether physically or psychologically. That is your physical and psychological integrity which is also protected under section 7 of the charter under life, liberty, and security of the person.
The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.
The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation developed for the medical community by the World Medical Association.
There are 2 Supreme Court of Canada decisions which bear an important to The Nuremberg Code and The Helsinki Declaration.
The first case Baker v. Canada Minister of Citizenship and Immigration established that interpretation of Canadian domestic law must be interpreted in accordance with applicable international treaty, whether or not we have domestically ratified that treaty.
The second case (subsequent to the first) R. v. Hape the Supreme Court ruled that any specific right contained in an international document or instrument is read as a minimal protection under section 7 of the charter. Therefore the rights and protections contained in The Nuremburg Code and The Helsinki Declaration are protected under and addition to section 7 of the charter.