They will simply say ICU admissions were low because the lockdowns and mask mandates worked and that without them admissions would be higher. And how can that be challenged?
(On a related note they are right now practicing for the climate "emergency." They will implement harsh policies causing mass hardship. When the climate stays the same they will claim it is because of their policies.)
They will simply say ICU admissions were low because the lockdowns and mask mandates worked and that without them admissions would be higher. And how can that be challenged?
(On a related note they are right now practicing for the climate "emergency." They will implement harsh policies causing mass hardship. When the climate stays the same they will claim it is because of their policies.)
Look at the present not the past.
My point is that there are locations that did lock down and those that didn’t and there is insufficient proof the lockdowns prevented more harm.