Vaccinated or unvaccinated, it isn’t appropriate to look at viral spread after death. The immune defenses shut down and the virus can move throughout the body. What is seen at death is not representative of what happened before death.
I don't think you understand, The vaccine teaches your body to make the spike protein which at the same time essentially acts as a toxin in your body, giving you the blood clots.
I understand that, but Jones seems to be misrepresenting the findings of the autopsy here. They were looking for viral spread in a person with one of two vaccine doses, who tested positive before death
I am definitely not saying ivermectin looks like it a promising defense post vax, and I assuredly do not want you to get the impression that Canadian equine tack shops sell ivermectin-only paste with no weird additives.
Listen to the tv, the government is your mommy, stop thinking.
No. The autopsy case study found with cycle threshold of 45 the presence of viral RNA (not the spike protein) in many organs. The study is evidence that Pfizer's shot induces a mild immune response.
From the study:
A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure...SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values ([the negative cut-off value was Ct >45)] [were found] in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum)...We demonstrated viral RNA in nearly all organs examined except for the liver and the olfactory bulb.
We suggest that a single treatment with BNT162b2 RNA vaccine elicited significant immunogenicity, as reflected in the reported spike protein-based neutralizing IgG serum values. From the weeks before vaccination, through vaccination (day 1), to shortly before death (day 24), the patient was free of any clinical symptoms typically ascribed to COVID-19...Because our patient died approximately 2 days after his first positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, we suppose that the molecular mapping data reflects an early stage of viral infection. An early stage of infection might also explain why different regions such as the olfactory bulb and liver were not (yet) affected by systemic viral spread.
Our findings are in line with previous evidence from animal models that immunization against SARS-CoV-2 by vaccination appeared to reduce the severity of pathogenesis, especially with regard to severe lung disease, while viral RNA persisted in nasal swabs...In summary, the results of our autopsy case study in a patient with mRNA vaccine confirm the view that by first dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity can already be induced, while sterile immunity is not adequately developed.
He didn't die from Covid-19 or his immune response to SARS CoV-2, he was 86 and died from other causes with Covid-19. "He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."
"the results of our autopsy case study in a patient with mRNA vaccine confirm the view that by first dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity can already be induced".
Is no one reading the study? Even the Info Wars article is misinterpreting the significance.
Vaccinated or unvaccinated, it isn’t appropriate to look at viral spread after death. The immune defenses shut down and the virus can move throughout the body. What is seen at death is not representative of what happened before death.
I don't think you understand, The vaccine teaches your body to make the spike protein which at the same time essentially acts as a toxin in your body, giving you the blood clots.
I understand that, but Jones seems to be misrepresenting the findings of the autopsy here. They were looking for viral spread in a person with one of two vaccine doses, who tested positive before death
Ivermectin takes up the space the spike protein needs in order to bind to your ace2 protein.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/
Also: "the FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro"
I am definitely not saying ivermectin looks like it a promising defense post vax, and I assuredly do not want you to get the impression that Canadian equine tack shops sell ivermectin-only paste with no weird additives.
Listen to the tv, the government is your mommy, stop thinking.
No. The autopsy case study found with cycle threshold of 45 the presence of viral RNA (not the spike protein) in many organs. The study is evidence that Pfizer's shot induces a mild immune response.
From the study:
this 'mild immune response' resulted in death? super.
He didn't die from Covid-19 or his immune response to SARS CoV-2, he was 86 and died from other causes with Covid-19. "He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."
"the results of our autopsy case study in a patient with mRNA vaccine confirm the view that by first dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity can already be induced".
Is no one reading the study? Even the Info Wars article is misinterpreting the significance.
You'll be alright. They'll die of old age, not of vaccines