To shut down an opponent this brazenly, you would think they are scared of what he has to say.
This is about stopping the PPC shaving any more points off of the CPC. Showing voters the PPC's true colours is a good way of stopping the bleeding of any more support to them.
Why would they take donation money to do so?
How else are they supposed top fund this? Campaign activities are funded by donations. That's how this works.
Say what you want about him and the PPC
Ok. What Kinsella and the CPC say about the PPC is true. One only has to look at the PPC userbase's comment voting patterns around here to know that.
I'm not pearl clutching, as you put it. I am thinking as to why they would do it.
If Max and his followers as as off putting and rude as your collection of posts would suggest, let him debate on the grand stage without funding a secret project to slander him, and let his followers speak for the party.
It is in the political ring where ideologies go to die or thrive. How are they supposed t do that when they can not even get on the first step?
If the CPC is bleeding members to the PPC, isn't it on them to change in some way to get those members back? You don't fund a secret slander project to do that. That is called being scummy, as I said before
If it's all true, let the man speak on public television or social media to embarrass himself, and show that he is a fool.
You showed me the same image again. Do you have anything else to back up the claims that his followers are racists/misogynists/general shitheads? Like, I am looking for legit sources, not stuff done in Photoshop or MSPaint
Polls are shown to be HEAVILY tilted in favor of who is polling for what party lately. Again, you were the one who said the CPC is bleeding support to the PPC:
Why would the CPC take measures to stop bleeding support to the PPC? Seriously?
So saying that they shouldn't change their politics to get supporters back is just strange to me. They don't have to "go full 1488 like the PPC" like you put it, just fond out what they are doing to lose that support, and find out what people really want out of the CPC. It's not that hard to do.
Again, how do you personally know that all the things said about Max is true? Do you have articles/reports/social media posts/anything to back up these claims? Researched sources that prove, without a shadow of a doubt that it's all true? If any of what is said about him is true, the CPC would have mountains of information to mud sling at this man as soon as he made the PPC to discredit him instantly, and he wouldn't even poll at 2%, like you claim.
P.S. While we are on the subject of pooling though, if polling was truly impartial, and the PPC was polling at 2% popularity, that is slightly over 760,000 people. Not a big dent in the total Candadian pupulation, but still a large chunk of people.
The more you deny it, the more I'm going to keep showing you the proof.
You guys should have thought about that before spending a year posting and upvoting open racism and Hitler praise in the PPC's name. By doing that, you made it a matter of public record that the PPC base are overwhelmingly racist. You made your bed, now lay in it.
I went to the WEF website like you said, but was having trouble finding this list of names. You happen to have a direct link i could use? Thank you in advance.
The way I read Trudy's and Harper's profiles is like a list of accolades. For Harper more exclusively, it says "2002, Leader of the Opposition; co-founded Conservative Party and won party leadership". This lines up with him being the CPC's leader in 2002, and then leaving in 2015.
He could still secertly still be the party lead, as the option to entertain that idea is always there, but facts say he is not the lead anymore.
For now though, we have O'Tool and Sheer there. Until such a time happens that they vanish, I will heavily believe Harper is retired. I will hold that he could co e back, as you said, but right now the reality is that the two stooges are in charge.
So, they used my donation to shutdown an opponent that risks giving Trudeau another majority?
Sounds like money well spent!
To shut down an opponent this brazenly, you would think they are scared of what he has to say. Why would they take donation money to do so?
Say what you want about him and the PPC, but I would rather the CPC debate their oppositions then covertly shut them down. It's scummy.
This is about stopping the PPC shaving any more points off of the CPC. Showing voters the PPC's true colours is a good way of stopping the bleeding of any more support to them.
How else are they supposed top fund this? Campaign activities are funded by donations. That's how this works.
Ok. What Kinsella and the CPC say about the PPC is true. One only has to look at the PPC userbase's comment voting patterns around here to know that.
https://i.imgur.com/cM45Agm.png https://i.imgur.com/cM45Agm.png
So you can quit clutching your pearls crying "slander!". You're not fooling anybody.
I'm not pearl clutching, as you put it. I am thinking as to why they would do it.
If Max and his followers as as off putting and rude as your collection of posts would suggest, let him debate on the grand stage without funding a secret project to slander him, and let his followers speak for the party.
It is in the political ring where ideologies go to die or thrive. How are they supposed t do that when they can not even get on the first step?
Why would the CPC take measures to stop bleeding support to the PPC? Seriously?
It's not slander if it's true.
Unfortunately for Max, his followers do speak for the party.
If the CPC is bleeding members to the PPC, isn't it on them to change in some way to get those members back? You don't fund a secret slander project to do that. That is called being scummy, as I said before
If it's all true, let the man speak on public television or social media to embarrass himself, and show that he is a fool.
You showed me the same image again. Do you have anything else to back up the claims that his followers are racists/misogynists/general shitheads? Like, I am looking for legit sources, not stuff done in Photoshop or MSPaint
LOL like what, go full 1488 like the PPC? If the CPC did that, they'd end up polling at 2% like the PPC does. Jesus Christ.
Once again, it's only "slander" if it's untrue.
So saying that they shouldn't change their politics to get supporters back is just strange to me. They don't have to "go full 1488 like the PPC" like you put it, just fond out what they are doing to lose that support, and find out what people really want out of the CPC. It's not that hard to do.
P.S. While we are on the subject of pooling though, if polling was truly impartial, and the PPC was polling at 2% popularity, that is slightly over 760,000 people. Not a big dent in the total Candadian pupulation, but still a large chunk of people.
Simple: https://omegacanada.win/p/12iNeEFmgT/omegacanada-census-2021-what-is-/c/
https://omegacanada.win/p/12iNeEFmgT/omegacanada-census-2021-what-is-/c/
https://i.imgur.com/cM45Agm.png
https://i.imgur.com/2jTQiHi.png
https://i.imgur.com/NePIU6x.png
The more you deny it, the more I'm going to keep showing you the proof.
You guys should have thought about that before spending a year posting and upvoting open racism and Hitler praise in the PPC's name. By doing that, you made it a matter of public record that the PPC base are overwhelmingly racist. You made your bed, now lay in it.
I went to the WEF website like you said, but was having trouble finding this list of names. You happen to have a direct link i could use? Thank you in advance.
The way I read Trudy's and Harper's profiles is like a list of accolades. For Harper more exclusively, it says "2002, Leader of the Opposition; co-founded Conservative Party and won party leadership". This lines up with him being the CPC's leader in 2002, and then leaving in 2015.
He could still secertly still be the party lead, as the option to entertain that idea is always there, but facts say he is not the lead anymore.
For now though, we have O'Tool and Sheer there. Until such a time happens that they vanish, I will heavily believe Harper is retired. I will hold that he could co e back, as you said, but right now the reality is that the two stooges are in charge.