Polls are shown to be HEAVILY tilted in favor of who is polling for what party lately. Again, you were the one who said the CPC is bleeding support to the PPC:
Why would the CPC take measures to stop bleeding support to the PPC? Seriously?
So saying that they shouldn't change their politics to get supporters back is just strange to me. They don't have to "go full 1488 like the PPC" like you put it, just fond out what they are doing to lose that support, and find out what people really want out of the CPC. It's not that hard to do.
Again, how do you personally know that all the things said about Max is true? Do you have articles/reports/social media posts/anything to back up these claims? Researched sources that prove, without a shadow of a doubt that it's all true? If any of what is said about him is true, the CPC would have mountains of information to mud sling at this man as soon as he made the PPC to discredit him instantly, and he wouldn't even poll at 2%, like you claim.
P.S. While we are on the subject of pooling though, if polling was truly impartial, and the PPC was polling at 2% popularity, that is slightly over 760,000 people. Not a big dent in the total Candadian pupulation, but still a large chunk of people.
So saying that they shouldn't change their politics to get supporters back is just strange to me.
The CPC is polling at 30%.
Your party is polling at 2%.
Why would the CPC want to dump the 28% in order to recover that 2% by swinging out to the hard right? It makes no sense. Like, do you not understand that 28% > 2%?
Why would they have to swing out hard right to get those supporters back? Looking over the big 3 parties here, they are mostly campaigning on the same issues, albeit just phrased differently.
The CPC is siting @ 30%, like you said. That is 11.4 million people. That is almost a third of Canada's population. Looking over the issues each party brought up in the 2019 federal election, most of what the CPC was doing was considered Liberal-Lite. Most of their policies were changes, yes I will agree there, but they were mostly reworded to sound different. If they actually took a stand, and did what the average person was hoping they would do, say these 760,000 that went to the PPC during that time, that would put them over a third of the population, and stamp out the PPC.
You want the CPC to win, I get it, but going back to the original point of this debate, you don't fund a secret slander project to discredit a political opponent. You debate them on their merits, and it;s their merits that will see them rise or fall.
LOL like what, go full 1488 like the PPC? If the CPC did that, they'd end up polling at 2% like the PPC does. Jesus Christ.
Once again, it's only "slander" if it's untrue.
So saying that they shouldn't change their politics to get supporters back is just strange to me. They don't have to "go full 1488 like the PPC" like you put it, just fond out what they are doing to lose that support, and find out what people really want out of the CPC. It's not that hard to do.
P.S. While we are on the subject of pooling though, if polling was truly impartial, and the PPC was polling at 2% popularity, that is slightly over 760,000 people. Not a big dent in the total Candadian pupulation, but still a large chunk of people.
The CPC is polling at 30%.
Your party is polling at 2%.
Why would the CPC want to dump the 28% in order to recover that 2% by swinging out to the hard right? It makes no sense. Like, do you not understand that 28% > 2%?
Why would they have to swing out hard right to get those supporters back? Looking over the big 3 parties here, they are mostly campaigning on the same issues, albeit just phrased differently.
The CPC is siting @ 30%, like you said. That is 11.4 million people. That is almost a third of Canada's population. Looking over the issues each party brought up in the 2019 federal election, most of what the CPC was doing was considered Liberal-Lite. Most of their policies were changes, yes I will agree there, but they were mostly reworded to sound different. If they actually took a stand, and did what the average person was hoping they would do, say these 760,000 that went to the PPC during that time, that would put them over a third of the population, and stamp out the PPC.
You want the CPC to win, I get it, but going back to the original point of this debate, you don't fund a secret slander project to discredit a political opponent. You debate them on their merits, and it;s their merits that will see them rise or fall.
Ok, so you're not living in reality here. Got it.