Why would they have to swing out hard right to get those supporters back? Looking over the big 3 parties here, they are mostly campaigning on the same issues, albeit just phrased differently.
The CPC is siting @ 30%, like you said. That is 11.4 million people. That is almost a third of Canada's population. Looking over the issues each party brought up in the 2019 federal election, most of what the CPC was doing was considered Liberal-Lite. Most of their policies were changes, yes I will agree there, but they were mostly reworded to sound different. If they actually took a stand, and did what the average person was hoping they would do, say these 760,000 that went to the PPC during that time, that would put them over a third of the population, and stamp out the PPC.
You want the CPC to win, I get it, but going back to the original point of this debate, you don't fund a secret slander project to discredit a political opponent. You debate them on their merits, and it;s their merits that will see them rise or fall.
If you are just going to result to insults instead of actually giving me news stories or statistics, like a normal person would, I would be able to debate better. You haven't addressed anything I have been saying other then posting your own cropped images of messages, and claiming it is PPC supporters that are driving this board.
Open your mind, and look beyond this board instead. Go for a walk, and see how people react to what is really going on. You keep telling my the PPC is evil, and nothing can redeem them, but you fail to give me evidence for cited sources to show these facts. You say the CPC needs all the support it can get, but you haven;t convinced me they are nothing but just rebranded Liberals, as a party total.
You can call me what you will at this point, insult my intelligence, or use the usual buzzwords to make me feel inadequate, but I will stand here and take it. This was a debate on the article, but you resorted to insults now. This shows either you have no evidence to show me of your point, or you think you are morally superior to me. Either outcome is not good at this point.
Why would they have to swing out hard right to get those supporters back? Looking over the big 3 parties here, they are mostly campaigning on the same issues, albeit just phrased differently.
The CPC is siting @ 30%, like you said. That is 11.4 million people. That is almost a third of Canada's population. Looking over the issues each party brought up in the 2019 federal election, most of what the CPC was doing was considered Liberal-Lite. Most of their policies were changes, yes I will agree there, but they were mostly reworded to sound different. If they actually took a stand, and did what the average person was hoping they would do, say these 760,000 that went to the PPC during that time, that would put them over a third of the population, and stamp out the PPC.
You want the CPC to win, I get it, but going back to the original point of this debate, you don't fund a secret slander project to discredit a political opponent. You debate them on their merits, and it;s their merits that will see them rise or fall.
Ok, so you're not living in reality here. Got it.
If you are just going to result to insults instead of actually giving me news stories or statistics, like a normal person would, I would be able to debate better. You haven't addressed anything I have been saying other then posting your own cropped images of messages, and claiming it is PPC supporters that are driving this board.
Open your mind, and look beyond this board instead. Go for a walk, and see how people react to what is really going on. You keep telling my the PPC is evil, and nothing can redeem them, but you fail to give me evidence for cited sources to show these facts. You say the CPC needs all the support it can get, but you haven;t convinced me they are nothing but just rebranded Liberals, as a party total.
You can call me what you will at this point, insult my intelligence, or use the usual buzzwords to make me feel inadequate, but I will stand here and take it. This was a debate on the article, but you resorted to insults now. This shows either you have no evidence to show me of your point, or you think you are morally superior to me. Either outcome is not good at this point.