Max works for the Soy lobby
(media.omegacanada.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
More communist drivel from the Cuckservatives who exactly like the Liberals make false claims about caring about families, in order to create cover to line the pockets of themselves and their friends.
The below study outlines how this policy transfers money from the poorest families to far better off ones.
"Canada's SM policies are highly regressive, imposing a burden of approximately 2.3 percent ($339) of income per year on the poorest households, compared to 0.5 percent ($554) for the richest households."
"As of 2009, the average Canadian household income was approximately $68,000 compared to $110,000 for dairy-producing households and $119,000 for poultry- and egg-producing households (Statistics Canada 2011)"
https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/full/10.3138/cpp.2013-062
I forgot to mention that at least the Liberals are honest about being communists, the Cuckservatives are more sinister, using the term Conservative to create a thin veneer that might appear slightly right of center. All toward milking the country dry just like the Liberals.
Except you're the one campaigning to keep Trudeau in office forever. We're the ones trying to boot him out.
I should clarify Ham that I like and respect you. You are trying your best to accomplish something important, namely denying Trudeau another term. Thank you for that.
I think we both understand each other's perspective and are simply coming to different conclusions.
Maybe I'm giving up on the team (CPC) at the wrong time, maybe if the people on my side focused our efforts it could increase the CPCs chances. I don't particularly like CPC, but they would be a lot better than JT, certainly in the short term.
A problem for me is I don't believe there is a real chance of CPC beating him. I do worry at the prospect of this division turning a JT minority to a majority.
But even if the CPC were to squeak a win through, the ground won't stop shifting. Our side of the aisle continues to erode. I think we need a fundamental change in policy to attract the disenfranchised, paired with a popular and charismatic leader.
I don't think we're going to get that until the CPC hits rock bottom and is faced with annihilation or reinvention. If they're going to lose anyway, I think they might as well lose on a grand scale.
Maybe in 4 years from now after the majority of Canadians have seen their lives and future prospects get dramatically worse, a re-invented conservative/populist party might be primed to sweep the board and make the kind of change that will allow for generations of freedom and prosperity.
TLDR
LOL I know you read it, you use the TLDR when you know you've lost.
Not that it matters, I'm not really replying to you, I'm just doing my part to expose your bullshit to everyone else.
:)
What would protect small family farms is
The rest would work itself out.
Exactly what worked in the past, shocker
Supply Management by government
and having government involved in opening new markets
... is how we got OVER-extended into USA and blamed USA (Trump) for favoring US farmers by shutting Canadian farmers out. Same with lumber and oil.
If our government creates it, ours or another government can destroy it. .
That's also a heavily Globalist position too.
Old Max "Canada last" Bernier.
You sound like a total fucking loser
I'd vote for Max even if he said he was a Communist...because he still wants to protect Canadians and Canadian values from "others".
Far better than the Libtards and Cuckservatives and NDP who won't admit it.
Wait, I thought I was ham ? I’m so confused now.
Little do you know I’m far right. My memes are on fleek