1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhhh you're going to need to post a source for the 99.9% stat you referenced.

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because when a scientist reports something a leftist disagrees with they are labeled as a not credible and removed from the discourse.

Becasue that's how low IQ leftists think science works

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

No I think you're incapable of deductive reasoning and independent thought.

You literally need to be told what to think.

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

So before covid when the system was overrun were the fat/smokers/drinkers/skiers overrepresented in the hospitals, or were they there in equal proportion to people who choose to follow healthcare advice?

Regardless I think we agree insofar that we both aren't in favor of universal healthcare. It should be private insurance, where people pay at least in part based on their personal choices. If you made the choice to be overweight, or drink, play dangerous sports etc you should pay more than someone who takes very good care of themselves. Maybe then we could have double the ICU capacity, comparable to the Americans.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-06/hospital-bed-shortage-shuts-down-canada-while-u-s-stays-open

But since the Canada Health Act is the law of the land, perhaps you can assist in parsing this section of the Act that was posted here yesterday:

"Universality

10 In order to satisfy the criterion respecting universality, the health care insurance plan of a province must entitle one hundred per cent of the insured persons of the province to the insured health services provided for by the plan on uniform terms and conditions."

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-6/page-1.html?txthl=health+canada+act

6
CanadianRighty 6 points ago +6 / -0

Haha funny now let’s see the same joke with fat people, smokers, drinkers, drug users, and other high risk personal decision preventable reasons who have been making terrible health choices for decades.

Oh wait most people fall under those categories… Scapegoat for government failure needs to be a small minority group who doesn’t vote liberal.. hmmmm…

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

The likely answer of course is he’s a shill getting paid $0.06 per post in an retarded attempt to convert us to the church of covid.

3
CanadianRighty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Preventable illness is the majority of health cost.

What you’re saying is the fatty/drinker/smoker/criminal/whoever who has been making shit health choices for decades is the victim, and the person who just wants to wait a few years before taking the 1 year old medicine is their oppressor.

In other words, it’s normal that people in hospitals are largely there due to bad choices.

Unvaxxed represent 10% of the population.

Canadian authorities always acknowledged there would be people unwilling to get the vaccine.

Why are they not prepared? Why are they not facing the blame?

South of the border there is vastly higher surge capacity. Why don’t we have that?

The vaccines don’t prevent the spread, covid is moving at an insane clip right now, and the system is still functioning.

This is literally the best case scenario, and in 10 or 15 years from now, when people are talking about how ridiculous the covid reaction was, people like you will nod along and smile.

I know this is when you start chanting “SCIENCE” and “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE”

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m just going to admit that it’s a pretty dumb title, but the sentiment stands 😛

2
CanadianRighty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, I think it’s about the great reset, and they expected the vaccines to be mostly harmless.

It would be a lot easier for them to jam this down everyone’s throats if it had the risk profile of traditional vaccines.

But who fucking knows, I wouldn’t be surprised if I was wrong and they do intend on depopulation. These people have proven themselves to be evil twisted fucks.

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

What gave you the impression he based his press briefing comment on an individual study or report.

The EMA is Europe’s CDC, this guy is the head of vaccine strategy.

He’s basically explaining the EMAs vision moving forward. He wants to transition into a variant specific dose before every winter once Covid is endemic. He thinks half of Europe will likely have contracted Omicron by March, and he believes in the dreaded natural immunity.

5
CanadianRighty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shill dude won’t accept this because the head of the EMA isn’t one of his approved scientists

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Boosters “can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly,” Marco Cavaleri, the EMA head of biological health threats and vaccines strategy, said at a press briefing on Tuesday. “We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic setting to a more endemic setting.”

Let me guess, the head of the European Medicines Agency is an unhinged conspiracy theorist

6
CanadianRighty 6 points ago +7 / -1

There may be hope for you after all, you’re finally starting to get it.

You’re right, I shouldn’t be forced to purchase insurance if I have the means of personally covering my own liabilities.

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guy is still pretending they caught all of the infections prior to Omicron, still has no idea what the difference between IFR and CFR. He’s totally out of his league.

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah so are you saying the system wasn’t overrun before covid?

Don’t worry I don’t expect and answer, I know you’re incapable of processing that question.

7
CanadianRighty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Which scientists should I ask BTW? Only the ones you promote I suppose

10
CanadianRighty 10 points ago +10 / -0

Translation, you’re not intelligent enough to think for yourself

17
CanadianRighty 17 points ago +17 / -0

You’re the one who needs to get your shit together bud, in case you haven’t heard the vaccines don’t prevent transmission, or are you still on the old narrative

4
CanadianRighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

incapable of answering simple question per usual

11
CanadianRighty 11 points ago +11 / -0

Finally the leftists have come full circle.

I agree, from now anyone who burdens the healthcare system due to a choice they made should face significant financial penalties, and not permitted to enjoy restaurants.

Overweight, smoker, snowboarder, motorcyclist etc etc.

I'm not any of those why have I been paying for their care?

1
CanadianRighty 1 point ago +1 / -0

You still don't know the difference between a case and an infection, after two years.

Explains why you can't seem to comprehend the difference between IFR and CFR.

6
CanadianRighty 6 points ago +6 / -0

Right, thanks

So there shouldn't be much difficulty in counting cases, since they're just counting positive tests.

I think the issue is counting infections, which they could never accurately do.

That's why IFR has always been so much lower than CFR.

According to Wikipedia my age category IFR is 0.068%. Risk for me would be vastly lower however since i don't have underlying conditions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic

oOoOoOooohhhh soo scary.

Good thing the vaccines protect grandma from me. Oh wait..

5
CanadianRighty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow for a guy who thinks of himself as intelligent you sure have a tough time answering a simple question.

What is a Case?

view more: Next ›