As someone who have studied a lot of math, I'm very grateful that it is built around using conventions and stick to them. It's built to be rigorous, self-proving and minimalistic. If this is cultural, well then it's a good thing?
Also, about how they speak about the different methods to achieve a specific solution. That might be true in very simple problems, but more complex problems usually are solved using methods that are named after a famous scientist who discovered them. If you think Jamal in the math class is going to upstage d'Alembert with this racist approach, you're smoking some shit you shouldn't.
These policies are definitely not written by competent mathematicians, who know the purpose of formalism in maths. At best they are written by average women who ended up teaching maths in high school, and at worse woke Nancies deeply convinced they are doing the virtous thing by taking a "cultural" approach to the only thing taught in school that has objectivity and logic left.
As someone who have studied a lot of math, I'm very grateful that it is built around using conventions and stick to them. It's built to be rigorous, self-proving and minimalistic. If this is cultural, well then it's a good thing?
Also, about how they speak about the different methods to achieve a specific solution. That might be true in very simple problems, but more complex problems usually are solved using methods that are named after a famous scientist who discovered them. If you think Jamal in the math class is going to upstage d'Alembert with this racist approach, you're smoking some shit you shouldn't.
These policies are definitely not written by competent mathematicians, who know the purpose of formalism in maths. At best they are written by average women who ended up teaching maths in high school, and at worse woke Nancies deeply convinced they are doing the virtous thing by taking a "cultural" approach to the only thing taught in school that has objectivity and logic left.