I think Chris does need to change his strategy, I think his emotions are getting in his way, even if he is in the right. In the written summary Rebel presents the questions they asked as facts instead of questions, which is what Chris sensed as a tactic to smear him so he walked out.
In the article Rebel writes, "Sky had allegedly said he was going to assassinate Premier Ford", "Are egos getting in the way", "old social media postings that have led to accusations that Sky is a Holocaust denier", and "Sky’s critics have also accused him of being anti-black, anti-gay, and anti-Muslim".
Chris, in his Chris way, did an ok job defending himself in the video. Rebel continues to try to paint him in a certain light in their article after he made fair refutations to their questions/allegations. It looks like Rebel has an agenda here.
And now I'm 100% sure that you guys changed your stripes because this started as an interview about anti-lockdown and it turned into let's assassinate the character of Chris Sky and try to make the Jewish community not like him.
Chris makes an interesting observation about Rebel's business model:
I know exactly what's going on now David, and now I know why I didn't get contacted by Rebel News for a couple months and now I also know why you guys got demonetized off of YouTube and you lost all your income, yet somehow you started hiring all these new people and somehow your station keeps growing and now when I go on your feeds on Twitter and stuff it reads more like a mainstream media platform instead of the Rebel News of old.
I think Chris raises an interesting point about them losing income but still growing. Ezra's rebuttal is they are 80% funded by viewers, but I'm not sure if that is verifiable.
The construction of the article is a hit piece. It's written as a summary and teaser for the video interview that suggests Chris might be a bigot, but you have to watch the video to see that he is not. Rebel should be asking tough questions to everyone, but the way the article is written smells like a MSM smear tactic.
They write in the article "Sky’s critics have also accused him of being anti-black, anti-gay, and anti-Muslim, based on other social media posts from years ago", but this isn't in the video. This is in addition to the other suggestive yet unanswered questions in the article (that Chris does rebut in the video).
I think Chris does need to change his strategy, I think his emotions are getting in his way, even if he is in the right. In the written summary Rebel presents the questions they asked as facts instead of questions, which is what Chris sensed as a tactic to smear him so he walked out.
In the article Rebel writes, "Sky had allegedly said he was going to assassinate Premier Ford", "Are egos getting in the way", "old social media postings that have led to accusations that Sky is a Holocaust denier", and "Sky’s critics have also accused him of being anti-black, anti-gay, and anti-Muslim".
Chris, in his Chris way, did an ok job defending himself in the video. Rebel continues to try to paint him in a certain light in their article after he made fair refutations to their questions/allegations. It looks like Rebel has an agenda here.
Chris makes an interesting observation about Rebel's business model:
Lmfao, you think Rebel took money to do a hit piece on Chris? From whom? Who would pay for that? Why would Rebel take that? Ezra went on a livestream and addresses the interview in detail. https://www.rebelnews.com/daily_livestream_july_14_2021 and then this one too https://www.rebelnews.com/ezra_reacts_chris_sky_storms_out_of_interview_with_david_menzies
I think Chris raises an interesting point about them losing income but still growing. Ezra's rebuttal is they are 80% funded by viewers, but I'm not sure if that is verifiable.
The construction of the article is a hit piece. It's written as a summary and teaser for the video interview that suggests Chris might be a bigot, but you have to watch the video to see that he is not. Rebel should be asking tough questions to everyone, but the way the article is written smells like a MSM smear tactic.
They write in the article "Sky’s critics have also accused him of being anti-black, anti-gay, and anti-Muslim, based on other social media posts from years ago", but this isn't in the video. This is in addition to the other suggestive yet unanswered questions in the article (that Chris does rebut in the video).