Fringe right wing sensibilities, like not agreeing with CRT, not wanting to flood immigrants into the country faster than any other country in the world, etc etc etc
But you are promoting the PPC, and their policy is to shut off immigration completely. And when challenged on this, you say "Oh we just want to reduce immigration ande defend against CRT". It's the classic motte and bailey argument.
The PPC policy isn’t to turn off immigration entirely, they propose a temporary hiatus, and ultimately a reduction to between 100,000 - 150,000 per year.
IMO this approach is more reasonable and moderate than the main parties’ approach of flooding the country with double probably quadruple that.
Meanwhile this mass immigration of dramatically favours the liberals at the expense of CPC.
To be clear I voted CPC since the founding, last time I had to pinch my nose pretty hard, this time they’ve gone too far.
A new leader and a platform in defense of fundamental freedoms and they get my vote back, till then they can pound sand.
Fringe right wing sensibilities, like not agreeing with CRT, not wanting to flood immigrants into the country faster than any other country in the world, etc etc etc
Are you familiar with the Motte-and-bailey fallacy? Because you're doing it right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy
You motte is "not agreeing with CRT" and "wanting to slow down immigration". Your bailey is "Ending immigration completely".
One of those positions is fairly moderate and could be popular with voters.
The other is extremely radical and will get you nowhere.
I wasn’t familiar; and while it is interesting it doesn’t apply since I’ve never once advocated for ending immigration.
I neither expect PPC to win or that my sensibilities are far right wing, so I’d say your meme is a straw man.
But you are promoting the PPC, and their policy is to shut off immigration completely. And when challenged on this, you say "Oh we just want to reduce immigration ande defend against CRT". It's the classic motte and bailey argument.
The PPC policy isn’t to turn off immigration entirely, they propose a temporary hiatus, and ultimately a reduction to between 100,000 - 150,000 per year.
IMO this approach is more reasonable and moderate than the main parties’ approach of flooding the country with double probably quadruple that.
Meanwhile this mass immigration of dramatically favours the liberals at the expense of CPC.
To be clear I voted CPC since the founding, last time I had to pinch my nose pretty hard, this time they’ve gone too far.
A new leader and a platform in defense of fundamental freedoms and they get my vote back, till then they can pound sand.