Fringe right wing sensibilities, like not agreeing with CRT, not wanting to flood immigrants into the country faster than any other country in the world, etc etc etc
Why don't you link to RationalWiki, the place where you really got the motte and bailey bs. Just an FYI for you, though pointing out percieved "logical fallacies" certainly makes for great snarky remarks, it doesn't refute or address any of his points.
Fringe right wing sensibilities, like not agreeing with CRT, not wanting to flood immigrants into the country faster than any other country in the world, etc etc etc
Are you familiar with the Motte-and-bailey fallacy? Because you're doing it right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy
You motte is "not agreeing with CRT" and "wanting to slow down immigration". Your bailey is "Ending immigration completely".
One of those positions is fairly moderate and could be popular with voters.
The other is extremely radical and will get you nowhere.
Why don't you link to RationalWiki, the place where you really got the motte and bailey bs. Just an FYI for you, though pointing out percieved "logical fallacies" certainly makes for great snarky remarks, it doesn't refute or address any of his points.