CPC doesn’t have a word to say against preventing the unvaxxed from domestic travel?
Do they not realize that we used to be their base?
It’s hilarious that these InterNazis call us traitors while they demand our papers.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Why ask questions when you're not interested in the answers?
I'll explain this as simply as I can, and then you go ahead and sperg out about virtue-signaling mattering more election coutomes or whatever/.
The majority of Canadians support all that insanity.
So that means if a party ever wanted to get elected and put a stop to it, they would have to not say so in their campaigning. Because if they did campaign on putting a stop to the insanity, they would lose and then they wouldn't be able to stop it.
Unfortunately there's a segment of the electorate who, while they want to stop the insanity, can't wrap their heads around the strategy necessary to accomplish that, and instead sperg out at the party who's trying to get elected because said party won't virtue-signal about stopping the insanity, thereby torpedoing thiert election chances.
There is only one way to change course here, and you're attacking the only party that's trying. You're putting emotion and virtue-signalling ahead of strategy. If you want to see where that gets you, have a look at the PPC's polling numbers. They're doing exactly what you want, and they're stuck at rock bottom.
But the strategy isn’t working. No one but you thinks they have a chance of winning, and since when does anyone care about the majority of Canadians. They only need about 36-38% of them to gain virtual absolute power.
I don’t buy that there is only one path forward, and that is attacking the rights and freedoms of a segment of the population.
Maybe I’m wrong. I’m open to listening. What evidence beyond your word do I have that CPC would cancel their attacks on the unvaccinated.
It's working a hell of a lot better than your is. Once again, do you want them to take the Benrier approach and end up with 2-3% of the vote?