In March 2022, CDC quietly altered their covid statistics by removing and deleting data they had previously used to claim vaccination for children was worth the heart damage risk. CDC admitted they had fabricated pediatric reporting.
Caution Tuchodi’s post is purposely misleading and dishonest.
5X Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18 Years and Older. False.
2x Higher in Unvaccinated Children Ages 5-11 Years.False..
2x Higher in Unvaccinated Adolescents Ages 12-17 Years.False.
4x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18-49 years.. False.
5x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 50-64 years.False.
6x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 65 Years and Older.False.
You choose to ignore the data that damages your psychopathic narrative.
UNDISPUTED FACTS 👇:
Tuchodi is advocating a dangerous injection that has NO long term data,
for which providing consent is therefore impossible and.
short term data shows it gives young boys a 600% higher risk of heart damage within a few weeks.
in March 2022, CDC quietly deleted and altered their covid statistics by removing data they had previously used to claim vaccination for children was worth the heart damage risk. CDC admitted they reported erroneous pediatric statistics.
Jesus man. The whole point of this thread is comparing the risk of exposure to covid, with the risk of exposure to the vaccine, and your response is to discuss the benefits of the vaccine when compared with a control? How in the fuck does that make sense in your head? Do you have even the most basic grasp of logical reasoning?
I actually don't mind you since you fire back against some of the more retarded members here. Yet, you seem to be amongst the most retarded.
"gee, since a thorough cost/benefit analysis clearly shows a favorable result towards not getting vaccinated, I decided to look at just the costs of covid without any consideration to the vaccine impact." Open a book.
She rejects math, logic and common sense. Which leaves no common ground if you’re sane and adjusted.
The only numbers she accepts are fraudulent, partial or tampered, from the CDC. She rejects all else.
She also posts Twitter quotes to support her personal opinion. Her favorite is a Twittertrician claiming myocardial infarction and heart damage as a side effect to a flu shot, is normal in healthy children.
Thanks for that link. Interesting data there:
In February, compared to fully vaccinated persons in each group shown below, the monthly rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations were:
5X Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18 Years and Older
2x Higher in Unvaccinated Children Ages 5-11 Years
2x Higher in Unvaccinated Adolescents Ages 12-17 Years
4x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18-49 years
5x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 50-64 years
6x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 65 Years and Older
In March 2022, CDC quietly altered their covid statistics by removing and deleting data they had previously used to claim vaccination for children was worth the heart damage risk. CDC admitted they had fabricated pediatric reporting.
Caution Tuchodi’s post is purposely misleading and dishonest.
5X Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18 Years and Older. False.2x Higher in Unvaccinated Children Ages 5-11 Years.False..2x Higher in Unvaccinated Adolescents Ages 12-17 Years.False.4x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18-49 years.. False.5x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 50-64 years.False.6x Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 65 Years and Older.False.You choose to ignore the data that damages your psychopathic narrative.
UNDISPUTED FACTS 👇:
Tuchodi is advocating a dangerous injection that has NO long term data,
for which providing consent is therefore impossible and.
short term data shows it gives young boys a 600% higher risk of heart damage within a few weeks.
in March 2022, CDC quietly deleted and altered their covid statistics by removing data they had previously used to claim vaccination for children was worth the heart damage risk. CDC admitted they reported erroneous pediatric statistics.
What? You don't like your own link?
Again?
Either you don't read your own links, or you don't understand them. My guess is the second.
Jesus man. The whole point of this thread is comparing the risk of exposure to covid, with the risk of exposure to the vaccine, and your response is to discuss the benefits of the vaccine when compared with a control? How in the fuck does that make sense in your head? Do you have even the most basic grasp of logical reasoning?
I actually don't mind you since you fire back against some of the more retarded members here. Yet, you seem to be amongst the most retarded.
"gee, since a thorough cost/benefit analysis clearly shows a favorable result towards not getting vaccinated, I decided to look at just the costs of covid without any consideration to the vaccine impact." Open a book.
Tuchodi’s opinion has no value.
She rejects math, logic and common sense. Which leaves no common ground if you’re sane and adjusted.
The only numbers she accepts are fraudulent, partial or tampered, from the CDC. She rejects all else.
She also posts Twitter quotes to support her personal opinion. Her favorite is a Twittertrician claiming myocardial infarction and heart damage as a side effect to a flu shot, is normal in healthy children.
Thanks for the kind words.
Got a link?