“We’ll have to wait and see”
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
UNDISPUTED FACTS 👇:
Tuchodi is advocating a dangerous injection that has NO long term data, for which providing consent is therefore impossible
Short term data shows young boys a 600% higher risk of heart damage within a few weeks.
In March 2022, CDC quietly deleted and altered their covid statistics by removing data they had previously used to claim vaccination for children was worth the heart damage risk. CDC admit they reported erroneous pediatric statistics, saying the false data was a “coding error”.
On March 20 2020 there had been a quarter of a million known cases of covid. A year later there had been 123 million cases. Two years later (that is, last week) there had been 475 million cases. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-covid-cases-region
So it looks like it's possible everyone will get it eventually. Would you rather have the serious heart problems associated with covid, or the mild ones associated with the vaccines? It's your choice.
"we found no evidence of an increase in the risk of pericarditis or cardiac arrhythmias following vaccination, except in the 1–28 days following a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Second, in the same population, there was a greater risk of myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Third, the increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination was higher in persons aged under 40 years. We estimated extra myocarditis events to be between 1 and 10 per million persons in the month following vaccination, which was substantially lower than the 40 extra events per million persons observed following SARS-CoV-2 infection." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0
"Evidence so far on myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccination suggests that the incidence of cases remains low overall. Moreover, when it does occur, primarily in young males, studies show cases are usually mild and resolved quickly.
Experts continue to assure the overall risks of COVID-19 infection far outweigh the risks associated to developing myocarditis after a COVID-19 vaccination, even in young men." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-myocarditis-explainer-idUSL1N2U72A8
"Rare heart inflammation cases (around one in 6000) were reported in teenagers after their COVID-19 vaccination. These cases have been mild and self-resolving. However, the chance of developing severe illness and death after a COVID-19 infection is much higher (2-10%). There is a higher risk of myocarditis from COVID itself than there is from the vaccine." https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/heart-inflammation-covid-19-and-the-rare-side-effects-of-the-vaccine/2021/09
"Also, mRNA COVID vaccines like those from Pfizer and Moderna have been linked with heart inflammation. But this is very rare, and you’re much more likely to get heart inflammation from COVID infection than the vaccines." https://theconversation.com/how-covid-affects-the-heart-according-to-a-cardiologist-165446
"COVID-19 infections are more likely to trigger rare cardiovascular complications such as heart inflammation and irregular heartbeat than vaccines," https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/heart-condition-risk-higher-after-covid-19-illness-than-vaccines-uk-study-2021-12-14/
Not one “study” you copy pasted STRATIFIES the myocarditis risk by AGE group. Lol
Hiding average age of 85yo in the hospitalization rate data and pretending the 16yo’s have the same risk is fraudulent. Typical of CDC tho.
HERE YA GO: STRATIFIED BY AGE,
Table 4 IRRs (95% CI) by age group 40 years or younger, and sex (male, female) for the outcomes in predefined risk periods immediately before and after exposure to vaccination and before and after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, adjusted for calendar time from 1 December 2020 to 24 August 2021
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0/tables/4.
The data is catastrophic Tuchodi. You are a sick, sick, sick woman.
If that was true you wouldn't be using a table from the first study I gave you.
And - as usual - you are linking to something that supports the use of vaccines. The table you're using supports their statements that "we found no evidence of an increase in the risk of pericarditis or cardiac arrhythmias following vaccination, except in the 1–28 days following a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Second, in the same population, there was a greater risk of myocarditis, pericarditis and cardiac arrhythmia following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Third, the increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination was higher in persons aged under 40 years. We estimated extra myocarditis events to be between 1 and 10 per million persons in the month following vaccination, which was substantially lower than the 40 extra events per million persons observed following SARS-CoV-2 infection."