82% of Hospitalized Covid Infections are Vaccinated in Alberta. It’s going up each week
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Nothing can protect the very old and the very sick from hospitalization. Canada has so few hospital and spare ICU beds per capita that we had to lose our shit and fabricate a scapegoat so that people would redirect their inevitable frustration away from the government. Most of Canada has to start scaling back ICU-requiring surgeries if more than 1 in 100,000 people become unexpectedly sick. Split people into groups of 100K. In that group there's likely to be someone who's ancient and/or catastrophically ill. Actually nix that, we assume that 9 of them are going to be that sick in normal times. We collapse when a 10th one gets that sick.
The people currently hospitalized with this are the sickest. It's just that it's only 1 in a million getting that sick now so we don't give a shit. COVID-19 isn't doing much of anything on a population scale. Other than serving as a wedge issue for the sitting party.
The irony of this is that that very sickly group OP is harping about here is probably the only group that there's a vaccination argument for. They're the ones that gum up the hospitals and the ones that are hardest to treat. The vaccines are probably having a therapeutic effect in that group and if it turns out that they're the asbestos of our generation, they're the least likely to live long enough to suffer the consequences of that.
For an overwhelming majority of people under 50, the vaccine is just smoke and mirrors because our government wouldn't have survived the lawsuits if they went ageist and forced it on the 50+ people instead of applying blunt force trauma to everyone over age 12.
While your description of the current critical care infrastructure is spot on, long term vaccine efficacy data is now in the negative. The vaccine is a failure. Tamiflu has way less side effects. Pfizer’s own phase 3 trial cited dubious vaccine efficacy, their absolute risk reduction was barely 1.5% and this was in mostly healthy subjects.
From the beginning starting March 2020 in the ICU, we were only seeing the obese, the comorbid and the elderly get admitted for Covid complications. The young and healthy did not get hospitalized in 2020. Anyone claiming the vaccine is now responsible for reducing the risk in the young and healthy in 2021 is lying. So I agree with you: smoke and mirrors.
The vaccine spike protein is a pathogen. Whether via mRNA (either in a nanoparticle or attached to adenovirus vector) it causes significant t helper cell type 2 activation. This is important for antibody class switching, but also increases ACE2 activity. Increased ACE2 creates all sorts of high risk pathologies in other wise healthy and young people. More ACE2 enzymes give the Chyna virus more ways to enter. The vaccine mRNA instructs the body to keep producing the spike that latches on to the ACE2 on mass scale. Increased ACE2 enzymes will cause increased pathologies in the young and healthy.
There is no tracking in place to count hospitalizations due to vaccine injury because increased ACE2 presentation is so wide ranging (cardiac, coag, hepatic, neuro) There is no reporting system in place to track how many ER visits took place in patients recently vaccinated. If anything they get falsely counted as unvaccinated when they present within 2-3 weeks
The triple vaccinated now have higher infection rates. The vaccine is the pathogen. Mandating it is insane.
I'm anti-mandate. Based on the pre-pandemic words of BioNTech's VP and various deep dives into lipid nanoparticle research, I'm not on board with the mRNA vaccines. The specific protein encoded by these ones is also pretty alarming.
The spike protein activates ACE-2 receptors. For some people this is catastrophic and we're seeing that.
I think we're collectively overlooking the lipid nanoparticle adjuvants though. The ones in Pfizer, at least, are slightly trophic for the adrenal glands, ovaries and eyes. Organs, that when suppressed by ongoing low key inflammation, should result in some pretty wide ranging symptoms.
An article from 2016 quotes the VP of BioNTech shit talking Moderna. https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/ "“I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech."
Nothing really has changed. mRNA protein therapies were meant for one off treatments or individualized therapeutics for old money types. BioNTech made it's name off the latter in Europe. The delivery materials are toxic. The excretion studies from the Pfizer dumps only accounted for 50% of the materials and turned up 0% of the compounds the scientists thought they'd decompose into. Moderna's EU authorization handwaves that they're using a different LNP from the one they were able to supply research on (additional tails on the one in use). But yeah, I kind of think this is going to end up being today's asbestos. The people who took repeated doses are going to get hammered by this. My gut says it will be easiest to detect as adrenal suppression which will be written off as long covid and pandemic depression by lazy general practitioners.
I do think that the % hospitalized isn't going to be reliable for much though. Without knowing the specifics of with/from covid, which strain of covid, comorbidities, and age. It might well just be that the kinds of people who tend to get 3 or 4 shots are already old and sick VS the kinds of people who opt out. There's no way to know if it's apples to apples. It could even be ADE or immunosuppression during the weeks that someone's body is responding to the last dose.
Sadly there's zero academic interest or will in Canada to investigate.
Agreed. on all.
I read this same STAT article when it came out. It’s worth noting that, Merck, Roche and Novartis abandoned all mRNA testing over the specific concern that the LNP’s was toxic, “especially if a patient has to take repeated mRNA doses over months or years.”
About vaccine induced myocarditis, and the mechanism, I wondered early on, why specifically young males? Mainly athletes or healthy young boys were getting it once vaccinated. This was troubling me the most. Immunocompetent young males never battled myocarditis during a natural infection, they were overwhelmingly asymptomatic. So why such high myocarditis incidence post vax? I assumed it was because healthy males metabolized proteins at a faster rate..
When the studies showed 12-16 males highest risk, I then assumed it is probably hormonal mechanism, Testosterone can inhibit anti-inflammatory immune cells and promote a more aggressive T helper 1 cell-type response. By contrast, estrogen has an inhibitory effects on pro-inflammatory T cells. So would help explain why healthy, high T males and athletes are at much higher risk for vaccine induced myocarditis. Antibodies to the spike glycoproteins cross-reacting with myocardial contractile proteins is also another probable mechanism.
Also about PEG. It was added to the vaccine to stabilize and protect the mRNA , yet it causes common systemic allergic reactions and even known for fatal anaphylaxis. I believe hypersensitivity to PEG is the main cause for the generalized rashes we are seeing in patients after the vax. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33011299/ The high incidence of vaccine induced anaphylaxis was discovered in test subjects during phase 3, the BioNTech papers show this. We admitted multiple anaphylaxis post vaccination last year, especially after patients first doses, kept many under observation in ER. No VAERS reporting was in place at that time.
This is shaping out to be worse than asbestos. Because of the government mandated exposure to it. And especially to children. The vaccine uses a toxin as a delivery mechanism, the cascade effects on the endo system, vascular, hepatic and neuro is unknown but the short term adverse effects are hammering the healthy and the young, already at an alarming rate.