Canada's biggest covid vaccine pusher believes that modeling is fact. This is the model that he presented to prove how many lives the covid vaccine saved:
Covid 19 vaccines prevented 14.4 million deaths..
Great study if you need something to confirm your own biases.
A scientific mind will question this study, though:
- In our effort to provide impact estimates globally, we introduced various assumptions into our model.
Interesting that they're making assumptions in a study published on June 23, 2022. They could have used actual real stats, as we're 2.5 years into this thing and the stats are plentifully available. Perhaps modeling is a way to present the vaccines better than they actually are to further the agenda of the author's bias?
- What kind of assumptions did the model make? Dozens, of which one particular one really stood out after a quick scan: we assume that all vaccinated individuals have a 50% reduction in infectiousness for breakthrough infections.
You're still pushing this in June, 2022, eh? When the assumptions are way off, the model will be way off.
- Now why would an author of a study misrepresent the numbers? Maybe there is a financial incentive for him to do so?
When Canada's biggest vaccine pusher posted this as his proof about how good the vaccine is, I told him that this is the type of study that would be funded by a company like Pfizer. Now, after a further inspection, I was wrong; it was funded partially by GlaxoSmithKline - The author received personal consultancy fees from GSK. The author is also on the Scientific Advisory Board at Moderna. Hmmm? Conflict of interest much?
But, yes, believe the modeling, just like retards believed this one.
EDIT: Tuchodi is having a fit. My criticism of this model is really bothering him. So I'm gonna throw out one more criticism to make him go crazy:
Models are used mainly to predict future outcomes, as was the case with this guy's model, which happened to be way off. There's no need to model past events when you already have ample statistics to report. Be wary of anybody modeling past events when they can directly report statistics.
Consider this analogy - Economists often model future macro economies. They're not often right, but they provide some indication as to where the economy is heading. Let's say they want to compare the past to the future. They can directly report past GDP, past unemployment rate, past inflation, etc and then create a model to compare it to future economies.
Economists don't model the past because they have actual statistics. If they did, we would supsect that they had an agenda, as modeling the past is unnecessary.
Sorry that educated people making educated guesses is such a problem for you.
But you're the person that's equating recovering in the hospital and going home with being dead, so I suppose we shouldn't be surprised. https://omegacanada.win/p/15JAT3EoQ0/update-for-every-457-people-that/
You got suckered into an experimental injection that the drug maker claimed was safe and effective after a 4 month clinical trial on 0.000005% of the population and you accepted to get injected without the long term safety data.
You are so uneducated, you personally believe the 2019 experimental vaccines was going to be effective for a 2021 strain.
Your tv experts lied to you. You unfortunately don’t have the intellect to use your own critical think. You simply copy paste the lie. It’s ok. Don’t be ashamed of your inferior intellect. We just want you to get boosted, as often and as soon as possible.
You've got one foot in 2019 and the other in your guesses about the future.
You should come and join us in the present, where two-thirds of the people on the planet have received at least one dose https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations and aren't falling over as a result.
Fauci lied. The CDC lied. And you fell for the drug makers claim.
That’s how uneducated you are.
And you still have no idea what you’re injected with. As we speak, you are yielding the long term safety data and mortality data.
You are at risk of vaccine induced heart disease, and vaccine acquired immunodeficiency, and you will STILL transmit covid, you will get covid infections and still get severe illness and you will still die. (See Ontario’s Covid Death Statistics, the triple vaccinated are at higher risk of DEATH).
We want you to get BOOSTED Tuchodi!
Folks, Over 5 billion people have received a covid vaccination so far. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations and over six million people have died from covid, a million in the US alone. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
BH says people are dying from the covid vaccination, and we know there was that one lady in England a year ago.
There are probably others.
BH should provide some facts. Enough facts to show that the risk from the vaccines is greater than the risk from the virus.
More evidence that you're a foreign troll...
Tuchodi, you’re going to be our uneducated guinea pig,
you are the lab rat that gets injected with the experiment as the rest of us wait for you to yield the long term fatality rate, the sudden death rate and long term vaccine injuries rate.
We are waiting for this data Tuchodi, because none of your experts have any idea what it is.
Fixed that for you.
They have a working hypothesis, and they know what the virus does.
Hold up, the people that ran the study have great credentials and are brilliant. They’re also paid by big pharma. Don’t believe everything you read.
OK
Not for this. "for work unrelated to COVID-19. ACG is a non-remunerated member of scientific advisory boards for Moderna and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness. ABH and PW have received personal consultancy related to COVID-19 work from WHO." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2822%2900320-6/fulltext#cestitle170
Don't believe everything you think. https://books.google.ca/books/about/Don_t_Believe_Everything_You_Think.html?id=T2iTP7W7Kq8C&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y
I think you missed that they were paid by GSK
I think you missed that the sixth and last member of the team - not the lead author nor any other member of the team, "has received personal consultancy fees" from GSK.
"They" were not paid by GSK..https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2822%2900320-6/fulltext#cestitle170
Educated guess or deliberate misrepresentation?
I'm just pointing out to anyone who hasn't drunk the koolaid what the science says.
You are perfectly free to believe that all the subject matter experts in the world are plotting against you or too dumb to know they're being used, while the only people telling the truth are the often anonymous ones on social media or the tabloid websites.. The people with no background in the field.
It’s bizarre that you think people care what your personal opinion is Tuchodi.
We just want you to get BOOSTED. As many times and as soon as possible.
Hey Tuchodi, I see that this is bothering you. I added an edit to the original post. This is gonna trigger you. Sorry.
No problem. I enjoy pointing out why people with an open mind should think critically about some of the things they see posted here.
Got those stats that you claim exist yet?
Lying is Wrong Tuchodi.
You wrote on Omega that you didnt have the education to understand science, math or statistics, so you admitted you didn’t use your own critical think because your didn’t have the ability to. Your words.
You’re a bad liar and an even worse propagandist
Still trying to be a fiction writer eh?
Note that poor command of English folks. A foreign agent, for sure.
Ya, the same stats that they used for their assumptions.
The ones you complained that they weren't using? I believe you were going to supply them, to show us what they should have done: