I plugged the following into my modeling software:
Canada’s population is 38,557,493.
60 % of Canadians have had covid as of August, 2022. Likely about 65% now. That means 25,062,370 Canadians have had covid.
Tuchodi told me that covid has a 1% death rate. Fact.
So my modeling software results showed that covid killed 250,623 Canadians (1% death rate).
My modeling software is science. So when Worldometers states that Canada only had 47,781 covid deaths, it proves that the official covid death count is anti-science.
All of a sudden ScoobyDoo ia a certified scientific researcher who gets his foundational documents from the main stream media and his data from social media.
What could go wrong?
This is science. And, my modeling software was funded by Pfizer. Dummy.
ScoobyDoo is a scientist everyone! Trust them. Their research will be published in a peer reviewed journal any day now.
What? My modeling software used just one assumption - Your claim that covid kills 1%. Are you gonna tell me now that this 1% claim is not peer-reviewed?
Watch for his peer-reviewed research folks. I'm sure it will show up soon.
Otherwise it's just advice from anonymous people on social media.
We all know that that's worth, don't we?
So the assumption was wrong?
Let us know when your proposition has been peer reviewed by other experts in the field and published in a science or medical journal.
Until then it's just something from an anonymous person on social media.
Are you talking about my modeling software’s very basic math or the assumption that was quoted by you? The only thing in question here is the assumption. Are you criticizing yourself, specifically?