Unless "stroke" means something different in the ER. Any nurses here? That is abnormal right?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
For those that argue that the results for everyone are different here's a reason why the whole plan was so evil.
There used to be a mixing video put out by the university of Toronto explaining how the properly mix the vials for distribution.
You create up to six vials manually from a single vial of mRNA. The user uses a syringe to suck out the mRNA and inject it into saline.
From there they manually shake the vial 5-10 times (depends on video).
That always sounded very unprofessional and would lead to natural discrepancies in vial consistency which would benefit the mRNA by causing randomization to help cover up the end result.
This is why there are multiple shots and boosters. Inevitably you end up with a strong dose and get a bad effect.
I would never trust a product that relies on a quickly trained worker to get right. Most of the mRNA were hastily trained new hires to meet demand. That's like trusting a guy from a factory with surgery. I'm sure he's skilled but in the end not for that job.
Here's a video that explains it. They hide the process now so the public don't see by saying "dilution material" at the part where they say "take 1.3ml of undiluted mrna and dilute it". The dilution material is saline and a single vial of mRNA creates 5-6 vials of mRNA administrative product https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MSjtau7I9HA