Pfizer Knowingly Allowed Dangerous Components In Its Vaccines
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Tuchodi and I just want to stop anyone from criticizing Big Pharma Giants and PFIZER!!
LEAVE PFIZER ALONE!!
LEAVE BIG PHARMA ALONE !
(Ugly cry, slaps own face, rocking in fetal position)
STOP BEING SO MEAN TO PFIZER!
(loud rage cry, wolf growl, then poops pants)
Lmao
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account is new
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account is new
Keep sniveling lab rat.
Your spoof account has more credibility now.
Tuchodi and I accepted to participate in a medical experiment. The long term data is unknown.
Sudden deaths are surging though.
All fat Liberals need to get boosted just like us. GET BOOSTED LIBS ✊🏽💉💉💉💉💉
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account is new
How do you decide which Big Pharma people you're going to listen to?
I tend not to trust the ones who believe in magic words, like your gal Yuhong Dong.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350923433_Case_Report_A_73-year-old_suspected_COVID-19_patient_with_severe_dyspnea_fully_recovers_after_reciting_nine_true_words_from_Falun_Gong
Yeah Tuchodi, totally agree.
No one needs safety data. Fuck that safety shit!
As uneducated lab rats, we are giving Pfizer the long term data they don’t have, for example, when I die suddenly, this will greatly help Pfizer and their safety data.
We are helping CDC science right now before our sudden death. #AllLibsGetBoosted ✊🏽💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account is new
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account is new
We on the same side. We both take drugs that have no safety data.
Weird you accuse our own side of being fake. 🤔
The real Urallfucked signed up in 2020
This fake account - as in "I'm already anonymous but my idea of fun is to pretend to be someone else" - is new
Whatever floats your boat, folks, I guess.
Fat Liberals need to get Boosted and stay double masked ✊🏽💉💉💉💉💉💉💉
I guess that everyone has their quirks. Is the content of her message incorrect?
Is the content of all the studies that say the vaccines reduce the damage done by the virus - and thus the load on the healthcare system - incorrect?
For example:
January 23, 2023 "These data support the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among children aged 5 to 11 years and endorse the universal age-based recommendations." https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2800743
January 11, 2023 "Following a homologous primary series of BNT16b2 or ChAdOx1 vaccine, mRNA boosters (BNT16b2 or mRNA-1273) provided substantial protection against severe COVID-19 cases during the predominance of Omicron variant for at least 3 months." https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004156#sec018
I'm not sure where the reference to protection appears in the article as it was referring to injuries possibly sustained by uninvestigated issues observed by a government body which:
Pfizer has not investigated the detrimental outcomes of truncated mRNA in its vaccines.
Pfizer submitted Western blot figures to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EMA that were digitally generated—not from actual experiments.
There has been an alarming lack of action taken by health authorities on this issue.
Truncated mRNA potentially contributes to multiple vaccine-related injuries, including misfolded spike protein-induced fibrous blood clots, autoimmune disorders, and cancer.
These problems with the Pfizer vaccine could have resulted in drastic product quality variations from batch to batch. This could explain the difference in adverse events experienced by vaccine recipients.
The root cause of such irresponsible conduct by pharma and health authorities is a lack of ethics. ...
Sounds like they weren't referring to your studies. They were more concerned in the article about the risks associated with truncated mRNA sequences which could have an adverse effect and have not been studied.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791314/#:~:text=As%20highlighted%20earlier%2C%20damage%20to,affect%20ribosome%20homeostasis%20through%20stalling.
Truncated mRNA is admittedly very dangerous per NIH.
Covid vaccines cause Anemia
https://www.cureus.com/articles/58777-a-case-of-autoimmune-hemolytic-anemia-following-covid-19-messenger-ribonucleic-acid-vaccination
Covid vaccines cause Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35103106/
Covid vaccines cause Autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35978510/
Covid vaccines cause Acute kidney disease and nephropathy
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35920797/
**Covid vaccines cause Autoimmune thyroiditis **
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35680353/
Covid vaccines cause Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=immune+thrombocytopenia+vaccine
Covid vaccines cause Cerebral venous thrombosis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34535076/
Moderna Covid vaccines cause Acute Transverse Myelitis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34579245/
Covid Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34365148/
Covid vaccines cause Interstitial lung disease
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34510014/
Covid vaccines cause Transient lymphocytopenia (actual immunosuppression) and herpes zoster.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34428545/
If you read the report referenced by your friend Daniel Ivandjiiski, disbarred Bulgarian trader (look him up folks), on his I-can-publish-anything-I-want-to-because-my-Daddy-Krassimir-Ivandjiiski-owns-this-website you'll see that it's a long and ongoing conversation wherein the assessor asks a series of questions about Pfizer's mRNA vaccine and is either satisfied with the answers or asks another question. The European Medicines Agency's report - all 111 pages of it - cannot be found at the EMA's website, which is odd, but is instead stored by young Ivandjiiski at https://files.catbox.moe/sg745z.pdf (cute domain name, eh?).
Presumably this is because the report is from Feb 17 2022, and has since been updated. The current document - from January 2023 - says "The potential for truncated transcripts to produce proteins/peptides was further investigated using a cell-free in vitro expression system. No truncated or other protein species were detected beyond the background bands observed in the negative control sample"
So Daniel and his Falung Gong friends are seriously out of step.
Do you find it odd that the newer version of the EMA document doesn't contain the contents of the previous versions in its tracking? Wouldn't that be a cause for concern?
Why "Cell-free protein synthesis" would not be a proper test is that the concern with truncated mRNA is the runaway generation on protein rather than showing a single instance with "background noise".
The "background noise" can exponentially replicate in the real world which is what the NIH document raises as a concern. This can become a dangerous artifact.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791314/#:~:text=As%20highlighted%20earlier%2C%20damage%20to,affect%20ribosome%20homeostasis%20through%20stalling
Seems that saying truncated mRNA was found to be inconsequential in "cell-free in vitro expression system" tests is not reflected in real world trials. Did they go beyond cell free testing?
This testing seems to be mechanical and may be used to incorrectly create a pro result statement.
Only Fat Libs and Lab Rats need to get Boosted and stay double masked ✊🏽💉💉💉💉💉💉💉
The CDC lies and we love it!