Sunetra Gupta, May 21 2020, "the epidemic has largely come and is on its way out in UK" https://unherd.com/2020/05/oxford-doubles-down-sunetra-gupta-interview/
Death toll in the UK in May 2020: 36,000
Death toll in the UK today: 209,000
Jay Bhattacharya, May 24, 2020 "If it’s true that the novel coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines, then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified. But there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high." https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464
Global death toll May 2020: 390,000
Global death toll today: 6,800,000
Martin Kulldorff, December 17, 2021 ...children's "Covid mortality risk is miniscule and less than the already low risk from the annual influenza." https://brownstone.org/articles/vaccines-save-lives/
Pediatric deaths from influenza 2020-21: 1
Pediatric deaths from covid 2020-21 >500
The Great Barrington Declaration holds the view that lockdowns do more harm than good. Nothing you wrote here supports your position that lockdowns are good.
You’ll have to try again.
Ahem.
It's right in the post.
Jay Bhattacharya, May 24, 2020 "If it’s true that the novel coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines, then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified. But there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high." https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464
He supported the use of those measures. He was just was wrong that they wouldn't be required.
Uhhh…
Here’s what you wrote:
I have to quote you due to your history of editing your comments after I destroy them.
Try to comprehend this line, especially:
Your supposed slam dunk debunk of this is to quote the current death toll.
This is a low intelligence response.
Quote the initial global death toll projections from May, 2020 and then the actual death toll. If the initial death toll is not orders of magnitude too high, then you have a slam dunk.
And I anticipate that you will claim that the projections were halted due in part to lockdowns. Sure, but this still doesn’t debunk The Great Barrington Declaration that holds the position that lockdowns for more harm than good.
Basically, this post is complete nonsense and is a biased opinion of a pro-lockdown extremist.
You seem to be having trouble with the fact that the expert saw no evidence that the virus would kill millions, and based on that he went on in the Barrington Declaration. to criticize the response of the public health authorities.
Then the virus killed millions.
AND he acknowledged that if the virus was to kill millions "then the extraordinary measures being carried out in cities and states around the country are surely justified."
What's your problem?
Hahaha! Classic. This whole entire post was based on a misunderstanding of basic English on your part. Classic Tuchodi, especially since you’ve been criticizing other people’s English lately.
I have to quote you once again, lest you edit this:
What you quoted doesn’t mean what you think it means. Read it again, carefully. If you still can’t figure it out, ask your mom.